Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Gr0uper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Sep 2006 19:27:09 -0700
Nag wrote:
Bob: forget about Binomial and about my problem.
I already have.
Reef fish: Thank you ... if only you can stick to your promise !!!
My promise was to leave you to your own devise of your number (3)
that you would only have it that way.
And I did.
My comment was not for YOU (and said so in my follow-up to the
expert that it was BEYOND your comprehension). It's for the rest
of the readership and to <se16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > who is
obviously knowledgeable in the subject and pointed out to you IN
DETAIL what I had said to you (in brief) about how your (2) was
WRONG without the additional details pointed out by
se16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
it is time for fresh blood: I am waiting for an expert to suggest an
approach to solving this problem.
Good luck to you. Experts would not attempt to solve a problem that
is ill-posed and ill-described.
-- Reef Fish Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: se16
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Nag
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Prev by Date: Afonso's BUNGLE that the GUILTY verdict in court corresponds to ACCEPT Ho.
- Next by Date: Re: Distribution of ratio of two normal distributions?
- Previous by thread: Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Next by thread: Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|