Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: "Nag" <Naga1010@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Sep 2006 02:00:05 -0700
Reef Fish:
So now you go crying to momma, what a baby and a bully. Can't take a
dose of your own medicine!!
My response was generated by your statement:
when Nag didn't even know which way to look in the first place, but^^^^^^^^^^^^
smart-donkey enough to insist of looking no other ways.
and your irrelevant and incorrect responses. Let google investigate. I
am sure they will be interested in the content and volume of your
posts.
Unlike you, I am not hiding behind an anoymous address. Why don't you
post your name, position and employer and then let us see what your
employer will have to say about all your postings.
Best
Nag
PS: Do me a favor and keep off my threads. No one appointed you monitor.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- References:
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: se16
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Nag
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Nag
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Nag
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Prev by Date: Reef Fish Bob is WRONG: Court Trials ARE NOT hypotheses tests
- Next by Date: Forecasting Accuracy Measurement
- Previous by thread: Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Next by thread: Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|