Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Gr0uper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Sep 2006 12:52:01 -0700
Nag wrote:
Reef Fish:
So now you go crying to momma, what a baby and a bully. Can't take a
dose of your own medicine!!
Well, as a matter of fact, I was acting as a MODERATOR of the
sci.stat.math
group, against violators who resort to use of obscene epitath in
response to
some straightforward comments about his ERRORs.
My response was generated by your statement:
when Nag didn't even know which way to look in the first place, but^^^^^^^^^^^^
smart-donkey enough to insist of looking no other ways.
And what was YOUR response? Why did you snipped it yourself
this time?
and your irrelevant and incorrect responses. Let google investigate. I
am sure they will be interested in the content and volume of your
posts.
Google would not have the time nor the expertise nor the reason to
investigate the CONTENT of my posts which violates no usage
agreements. Google is well aware of the VOLUME of my posts, which
is NOT a violation of any posting rules.
Sorry you are ignorant about such matters.
Unlike you, I am not hiding behind an anoymous address.
That's the typical comment of a "Clueless Newbie". In your case, it
is particularly amusing, because you think Naga1010 is your
real name and that is mattered?
Why don't you
post your name, position and employer and then let us see what your
employer will have to say about all your postings.
Best
Nag
Why don't you buy a CLUE. Readers of this group is laughing so hard
at your cluelessness that some of them probably had to clean their
keyboard and monitor for the uncontrollable spit of coffee from their
mouths when they saw your line.
Next time, you should warn them first, by a warning, such as
NEWBIE ALERT!!
PS: Do me a favor and keep off my threads. No one appointed you monitor.
What have you done to serve me doing you a favor?
I had already kept off "your thread" by telling you that you have to
do it on your own on your silly condition (3) that you want to do it
ONLY
YOUR WAY.
Then you started your gratuitous replies which I merely showed that you
were WRONG.
As for monitor? EVERYONE in this newsgroup has the right and
responsibility to be a MODERATOR of the newsgroup, according to the
tradition of USENET. That's just one other CLUE you were missing.
If you want to see if ANYONE wants to help you solve your problem on
your ridiculous terms, after your inability to ask the question and
errors
made in your description -- just SHUT UP and wait for your help.
Continuing to make your noise is not going to help you one bit.
-- Reef Fish Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Anon.
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- References:
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: se16
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Nag
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Nag
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Nag
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- From: Nag
- Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Prev by Date: Re: Two nit-picks re definition of p-value (Was: goodness of fit ?)
- Next by Date: Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Previous by thread: Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Next by thread: Re: Multinomial approximation to Poisson ??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|