Re: Reef Fish Bob is WRONG: Court Trials ARE NOT hypotheses tests


"Luis A. Afonso" wrote:
Reef Fish Bob is WRONG: Court Trials ARE NOT hypotheses tests

Nobody can teach you what an analogy means, but at least you stopped
making LIBELOUS statements about Bob Ling who had never posted a
single piece in this forum. This is the Bob Ling (and I am sure many
other
Bob Lings) you have libeled against:

http://www.kcc.edu/faculty/faculty_pages/bling/index.asp

As for your lack of understanding of the Hypothesis Testing concept and

execution, your FREE tuition had been withdrawn, so you just have to
continue to make a FOOL of yourself in your ignorance in STATISTICS.

That's the price of Free Speech and an Open Forum in serious Statistics
has to pay -- anyone to show and prove their ignorance.

But remember, you DO NOT have the right to be disruptive because of
own ignorance, nor the right to LIBEL anyone in an Open Forum. The
latter is ILLEGAL and can be prosecuted in court. That's also the
complaint that had been filed on your LIBEL, to Google, to the MATH
FORUM, and to Drexel University.

-- Reef Fish Bob.





The simple fact that innocence (called technically NOT GUILTED, as in the general case, which is immaterial for this discussion) could be sometimes stated the Reef Fish thesis of EXACT ANALOGY between Test Hypotheses and Court trials is completely absurd.

Is easy to prove that was impossible the defendant to commit the crime (murder) in these cases:

__1__it was geographically sufficiently far away at the time
__2__physically impaired
__3__so badly ill that he is unable to leave his wheel chair.
__4__in jail,
__5__supported by several completely trustable witnessing
__6__attending,at the time of the crime, a public spectacle (movies, baseball, concert), and be recognized by truthful witnesses in the criminal Court.
__7__performing in a spectacle: singing, dancing, playing basketball, piano, sport, at the time of the murder.


_________licas (Luis A. Afonso)

.