Re: The Chronicles of Bob Ling's bumbLINGs
- From: Russell.Martin@xxxxxxx
- Date: 11 Sep 2006 07:07:57 -0700
Nag wrote:
Russell:
I presume
You presume when you could have gathered data. I've posted
here for a while and my past comments on RF's tone in his
posts are archived. Of course, that would have required that
you do a bit of work...
you haven't seen Bob Ling's choice of words. Why not take a
look at his postings in a thread I started and then comment?
Best
Nag
Why note get some data as I suggested above and then
reply to me? Even better, quite posting off topic junk
like the first post in this thread. If you have some
comments about RF's abrasive tone, just be direct and
write "Bob, you have an abrasive tone which tends to
unnecessarily annoy people" or something like that.
Then I might even agree with you. But what you posted
was just, as I said, gratuitous.
Cheers,
Russell
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- The Chronicles of Bob Ling's bumbLINGs
- From: Nag
- Re: The Chronicles of Bob Ling's bumbLINGs
- From: Russell . Martin
- Re: The Chronicles of Bob Ling's bumbLINGs
- From: Nag
- The Chronicles of Bob Ling's bumbLINGs
- Prev by Date: Re: Testing differences on PROPORTIONS EXACTLY
- Next by Date: Probability question
- Previous by thread: Re: The Chronicles of Bob Ling's bumbLINGs
- Next by thread: Re: The Chronicles of Bob Ling's bumbLINGs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|