Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- From: "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Gr0uper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2006 11:14:02 -0700
Anon. wrote:
Reef Fish wrote:
Anon. wrote:<snip>
<snip>You've claimed that I'm wrong. You're refusing to back it up. I'm
calling you on it: either back up your words, or admit you're wrong.
--
Bob O'Hara
Anon Bob,
When you say "I refuse to back it up" that's because I've wasted too
much time trying to teach you something you should have known and
it took forever to EXPLAIN it to you and you still don't get it.
That's why I declared, after having gone through this many times before
that your FREE lessons are OVER.
When I say you're wrong, there may be a simple reason or there may
not be something not as simple, but in either case, in YOUR case, I
am under no obligation to back myself up, because you have proven
yourself to be so ignorant on all statistical matters that you have
engaged yourself since early 2005.
If you want to learn statistics, take some lessons in your university
where there are probably some statisticians who can teach you
what you need.
Here's your FINAL extorted FREE LESSON.
Why should you back up your claims?
(1) You are impugning my competence.
Because you ARE incompetent.
I had shown it in this example, and had shown it in the Linear Models
and other problems in this group.
(2) If you're claiming that I'm wrong, then other readers (e.g. the OP)
might want to know what is wrong.
They can probably read and comprehend better than you can, as was
shown on numerous previous occasions.
(3) By refusing to back up your claims,
I made an exception and gave you the FREE LESSON.
You forgot to clip and save my Perpetual Declaration to you that
your trick to extract another free lesson WILL NEVER work again.
Bob O'Hara
Get you a statistical EDUCATION. That's the free advice you get.
-- Reef Fish Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Anon.
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Anon.
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Anon.
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Anon.
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Anon.
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- From: Anon.
- A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- From: Anon.
- Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- From: Anon.
- Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- From: Anon.
- Re: large negative parameter correlations in regression
- Prev by Date: The urn problem with weighed balls
- Next by Date: Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- Previous by thread: Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- Next by thread: Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|