sci.stat.math

• Thread Index

---

• Re: kurtosis
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Time To Teach Digital Etiquette
  • From: TomC
• Re: kurtosis
  • From: David Jones
• Re: kurtosis
  • From: David Jones
• Re: kurtosis
  • From: joseph Frank
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Anyone found an Elementary Bayesian Book yet?
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Time To Teach Digital Etiquette
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Time To Teach Digital Etiquette
  • From: TomC
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• YOU ARE STUPIDLY RIDICULOUS REEF FISH
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: How to calculate the CI use the bootstrap method
  • From: Glen
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: glenbarnett
• Afonso #1 is BACK, after Afonso #2 was exposed!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: glenbarnett
• Reply from Dr. Ribble on CyberBullying
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Google Group scistatmath
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Time To Teach Digital Etiquette
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: glenbarnett
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: glenbarnett
• Re: Testing Two Proportions
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Multinomial logit model
  • From: David Winsemius
• THREE reasons why the current Afonso is a NEW one.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Testing Two Proportions
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Google Group scistatmath
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Testing Two Proportions
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Testing Two Proportions (the same NEW Afonso POLLUTION)
  • From: Reef Fish
• How to calculate the CI use the bootstrap method
  • From: glare22
• Re: Multinomial logit model
  • From: Marik
• Re: Testing Two Proportions
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: yakir gagnon
• Re: Analytic approach using irregular time-series data?
  • From: Arto Huttunen
• Re: Testing Two Proportions (a DIFFERENT Afonso is HERE!!)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Anyone found an Elementary Bayesian Book yet?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Analytic approach using irregular time-series data?
  • From: kenneth_m_lin
• Testing Two Proportions
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Anyone found an Elementary Bayesian Book yet?
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Time To Teach Digital Etiquette
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Time To Teach Digital Etiquette
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Anyone found an Elementary Bayesian Book yet?
  • From: Reef Fish
• John Uebersax resorts to unsubstantiated claims and LIBEL
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: kurtosis
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Anyone found an Elementary Bayesian Book yet?
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Analytic approach using irregular time-series data?
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: John Uebersax
• Time To Teach Digital Etiquette
  • From: jon
• Analytic approach using irregular time-series data?
  • From: Ygor Melkin
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Anyone found an Elementary Bayesian Book yet?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Anyone found an Elementary Bayesian Book yet?
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Anyone found an Elementary Bayesian Book yet?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Russell
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Reef Fish
• Luis A. Afonso is making Disruptive NOISE in a SECOND subject
  • From: Reef Fish
• Disruptive Afonso(S) are back! At least 15 TIMES in the thread started by Marco.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: IGNORANCE IS NOISY, Reef Fish
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Any hint for the "model" of this curve?
  • From: John Herman
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: Art Kendall
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: David Winsemius
• IGNORANCE IS NOISY, Reef Fish
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Multinomial logit model
  • From: Philip A . Viton
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: Reef Fish
• Disruptive Afonso(S) are back! 9 times in THIS thread
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: yakir gagnon
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: Art Kendall
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: yakir gagnon
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: Art Kendall
• Reef Fish has NOTHING to say about Jarque-Bera statistics
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitim
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" is back on the market again!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Biostatistics Soluitons Manual
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitim
  • From: Anahita
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: yakir gagnon
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: manas
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Test statistic
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Test statistic
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Biostatistics Soluitons Manual
  • From: Beroxie
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Multinomial logit model
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: Art Kendall
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Reef Fish
• EasyFit - Distribution Fitting Software
  • From: MathWave Technologies
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: yakir gagnon
• a copy of the solution manual to mmgghh2008@yahoo.com, pls
  • From: hanhan2008
• send me a copy to mmgghh2008@yahoo.com, please
  • From: hanhan2008
• My 300th post for the month of October
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Signature analysis
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Assessing credibility of a q-q plot by presence of outliers
  • From: Reef Fish
• kurtosis
  • From: joseph Frank
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitim
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitim
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Assessing credibility of a q-q plot by presence of outliers
  • From: Aleik
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitim
  • From: Anahita
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitim
  • From: Anahita
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitim
  • From: Anahita
• (1 Typo correction) Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Reef Fish
• Multinomial logit model
  • From: Marik
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: David A. Heiser
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: David A. Heiser
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• CFP: CSNA 2007
  • From: Dave Dubin
• Re: p-value
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Anon.
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: p-value
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: John Uebersax
• different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
  • From: wtplasar@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: Anahita
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: glenbarnett
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: perreault . c
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: perreault . c
• Computing AUC (ROC)when there is no FPR of 0 or 1
  • From: Ed
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: Reef Fish
• m00es repeats SAME ERRORS in VALIDATION of Assumptions
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Testing for normality
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Mean survival calculation
  • From: Nicbrez
• Re: Mean survival calculation
  • From: Nicbrez
• Re: p-value
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: David A. Heiser
• Signature analysis
  • From: yakir gagnon
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: perreault . c
• Re: p-value
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: David A. Heiser
• Mean survival calculation
  • From: Nicbrez
• Re: p-value
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• Re: Raja's Question and Answer on R and MSE RE-VISITED
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: p-value
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• Re: p-value
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• Re: p-value
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: p-value
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• Re: p-value
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: p-value
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• Testing for normality
  • From: Marco
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: p-value
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sinusoidal curve - quality of fit?
  • From: john2
• Re: Raja's Question and Answer on R and MSE RE-VISITED
  • From: m00es
• <insert neutral topic here>
  • From: m00es
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: glenbarnett
• Re: p-value
  • From: espyrian
• Re: p-value
  • From: kenneth_m_lin
• Re: p-value
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: p-value
  • From: espyrian
• p-value
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Inconsequential Erratum: MSE = 66 in an example
  • From: Reef Fish
• A problem on twice conditional probability
  • From: liu.yang76@xxxxxxxxx
• Raja's Question and Answer on R and MSE RE-VISITED
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: <insert a neutral topic here>
  • From: Raja
• m00es repeats SAME ERRORS in VALIDATION of Assumptions
  • From: Reef Fish
• How do you interpret the DS when p-values shows normality but skewness and kurtosis differ correspondingly from 0 and 3
  • From: Tzveta Iordanova
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: perreault . c
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: Anahita
• Re: Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: glenbarnett
• Re: Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: glenbarnett
• Maximum Likelihood estimation
  • From: perreault . c
• Conditionally independent given a RANDOM VECTOR????
  • From: VijaKhara
• Re: z Value
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: z Value
  • From: kenneth_m_lin
• Experienced Statistician to help decide whether a regression is legitimate
  • From: Anahita
• Re: Measurement repeatability and utility: Inter- and intra-subject variation
  • From: junk6
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" explained by Afonso
  • From: Reef Fish
• The TRUTH about Test Hypotheses
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Need a Loan ?
  • From: flyawayteekss
• Re: Kankakee´s Theories and Fish Physiologists
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Kankakee´s Theories and Fish Physiologists
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Kankakee´s Theories and Fish Physiologists
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: z Value
  • From: Reef Fish
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" Afonso LIBELED again!
  • From: Reef Fish
• <insert neutral topic here>
  • From: m00es
• m00es is COMPLETELY OUT OF Air and DROWNED by his own NOISE.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Kankakee´s Theories and Fish Physiologists
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• need a financial data set without time component
  • From: smart0072000in
• <insert neutral topic here>
  • From: m00es
• Re: do you recognize the shape of this curve?
  • From: dave
• Re: m00es's NOISE explained because he is REPEATING the SAME ad infinitum
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• The FINAL, FINAL KO and Check-Mate of m00es in Applied Simple Regression.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: z Value
  • From: kenneth_m_lin
• <finally getting back to statistical substance>
  • From: m00es
• Re: Conditionally independent with a Process. Please help.
  • From: VijaKhara
• Re: How to call the variable \alpha in confidence interval?
  • From: Reef Fish
• m00es's NOISE explained because he is REPEATING the SAME ad infinitum
  • From: Reef Fish
• How to call the variable \alpha in confidence interval?
  • From: pomdps
• Re: Pr and false-positives
  • From: Art Kendall
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: oercim
• <insert a neutral topic here>
  • From: m00es
• testing whether covariance has changed over time
  • From: abbottkc
• Sinusoidal curve - quality of fit?
  • From: tsokas
• Re: Comparison 1 Model in two datasets: need advice
  • From: Anon.
• Comparison 1 Model in two datasets: need advice
  • From: Jim
• Lower one-sided CI
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pr and false-positives
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pr and false-positives
  • From: Reef Fish
• m00es has turned into a NOISE Specialist
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Pr and false-positives
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: Greg Heath
• <insert neutral topic here>
  • From: m00es
• Conditionally independent with a Process. Please help.
  • From: VijaKhara
• Re: Pr and false-positives
  • From: Reef Fish
• Any hint for the "model" of this curve?
  • From: o
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: oercim
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: oercim
• Pr and false-positives
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: signal to noise ratio?
  • From: Reef Fish
• signal to noise ratio?
  • From: oercim
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Afonso Lectures on "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies"
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: z Value
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: z Value
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: wojciech
• Re: I have Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: Reef Fish
• Afonso joins m00es in NOISE POLLUTION again!
  • From: Reef Fish
• m00es is starting his NOISE POLLUTION again!
  • From: Reef Fish
• z Value
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: ringwo
• Re: Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: ringwo
• Re: I have Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: ringwo
• Re: [Newbie] do you recognize the shape of this curve?
  • From: o
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: [Newbie] do you recognize the shape of this curve?
  • From: o
• Re: [Newbie] do you recognize the shape of this curve?
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Method of interval estimation
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• [Newbie] do you recognize the shape of this curve?
  • From: o
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: m00es
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Instability in Numerically computing the moments of Weibull function...
  • From: John Mauer
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: m00es
• Re: I have Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Method of interval estimation
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: Anon.
• Method of interval estimation
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: I have Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: shahram
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: Anon.
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Unbiased Estimate of Mean for Unequal Probability Sampling
  • From: Samantha
• Re: Given matrix ,X and vectors y, w solve for T in Y=XTw
  • From: George Smith
• Re: RF: nice post but one question and two errors need to be answered
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Problem
  • From: john2
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Jean-Marc
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Jean-Marc
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Jean-Marc
• Problem
  • From: Shaun . OKane
• Re: ancova?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: AB
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: AB
• ancova?
  • From: Jean-Marc
• RF fails to answer the question...again
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Tinwai
• RF: nice post but one question and two errors need to be answered
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
• A problem about conditional probability with 2 conditions
  • From: Tinwai
• Re: Counting question about Hearts
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Regression, weighted sum
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Counting question about Hearts
  • From: dale6998
• Re: Given matrix ,X and vectors y, w solve for T in Y=XTw
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Counting question about Hearts
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Given matrix ,X and vectors y, w solve for T in Y=XTw
  • From: m00es
• Illywhacker's LIES had been documented, much earlier, in the archives
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: AB and Reef Fish Bob explained AB's HPD question and Bayesian answer
  • From: Reef Fish
• Given matrix ,X and vectors y, w solve for T in Y=XTw
  • From: George Smith
• Call for Abstracts - NIPS 2006 Workshop on Causality and Feature Selection
  • From: Alexander Statnikov
• Re: Measurement repeatability and utility: Inter- and intra-subject variation
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Counting question about Hearts: RF bungles again
  • From: illywhacker
• In your desperation, RF,...
  • From: illywhacker
• "No way, LIAR": some more simple questions for RF
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Openbugs Functionals/External calls
  • From: Anon.
• AB and Reef Fish Bob explained AB's HPD question and Bayesian answer
  • From: Reef Fish
• Openbugs Functionals/External calls
  • From: vontressms
• Re: MAP is not posterior mode: Illywhacker continues to LIE inspite of AB's clarification.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Measurement repeatability and utility: Inter- and intra-subject variation
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: Anon.
• MAP is not posterior mode: RF is back!
  • From: illywhacker
• Zero-cell - Logistic regression
  • From: Daniel
• Re: CI
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Measurement repeatability and utility: Inter- and intra-subject variation
  • From: Marc Schwartz
• Re: Measurement repeatability and utility: Inter- and intra-subject variation
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Regression, weighted sum
  • From: Heinz Babbeldu
• Re: Measurement repeatability and utility: Inter- and intra-subject variation
  • From: m00es
• Re: Regression, weighted sum
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Measurement repeatability and utility: Inter- and intra-subject variation
  • From: m00es
• Measurement repeatability and utility: Inter- and intra-subject variation
  • From: junk6
• Re: In Need of a Stochastic Model
  • From: David Jones
• Smile, and the whole world...
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density - AB is back...
  • From: AB
• <insert a neutral topic here>
  • From: m00es
• <insert a neutral topic here>
  • From: m00es
• <insert a neutral topic here>
  • From: m00es
• Re: CI
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Regression, weighted sum
  • From: Heinz Babbeldu
• Random process along the linear networks
  • From: pransri2006
• Re: nearest neighbor and clustering
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: normally distributed
  • From: espyrian
• Re: CI
  • From: espyrian
• CI
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• m00es changes the topic again to BE idiotic
  • From: Reef Fish
• m00es changes the topic again to BE idiotic
  • From: Reef Fish
• Reef Fish changes the topic again to something idiotic
  • From: m00es
• m00es changes the topic again to BE idiotic
  • From: Reef Fish
• m00es REFUSES to read thread that EXPLAINED his ERRORS.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Reef Fish changes the topic again to something idiotic
  • From: m00es
• Re: Reef Fish changes the topic again to something idiotic
  • From: m00es
• m00es resorted to trick of QUOTE OUT OF CONTEXT in his NOISE.
  • From: Reef Fish
• m00es REFUSED to read the existing thread on the SPSS 1975 Manual EXAMPLE when he didn't even know what the discussion was about!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: m00es
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: m00es
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: m00es
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: m00es
• Illywhacker continues to WHACK, WHACK, WHACK!
  • From: Reef Fish
• RF avoids the substance of his error...again
  • From: illywhacker
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" ON SALE again!!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Counting question about Hearts
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: RF's idea of substance: MAP is NOT used by Bayesians!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Counting question about Hearts
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: In Need of a Stochastic Model
  • From: Russell
• In Need of a Stochastic Model
  • From: Glenn
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: robert . dodier
• RF's idea of substance: MAP is not posterior mode
  • From: illywhacker
• m00es was REALLY one of Luis A. Afonso's personna.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Afonso empirically veried RF's First Conjecture about m00es and Afonso!!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: All the world's a QUACK: Illywhacker thinks FOUR of them makes the world. LOL.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Buffer Management
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: Some of Reef Fish's behavior MUST NEVER AGAIN BE TOLERATED
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• All the world's a QUACK (except RF)
  • From: illywhacker
• RF: a Bayesian who knows Bayesians don't use MAP except in geography
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Counting question about Hearts
  • From: Reef Fish
• RF: a 'statistics professor' who thinks MAP is not posterior mode
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: Reef Fish
• RF: a 'stats professor' who thinks MAP is not posterior mode
  • From: illywhacker
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" on SALE again
  • From: Reef Fish
• Buffer Management
  • From: wumin_noname
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: Jay Cole
• Re: m00es, Illywhacker, O'Hara, and Afonso are like Internet Cafe attandants
  • From: Jay Cole
• Re: NEGATIVE HYPERGEOMETIC DISTRIBUTION
  • From: Alon
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Some of Reef Fish's behavior MUST NEVER AGAIN BE TOLERATED
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Please, help me to verify the relationship dj=Cxj, d bar = C x bar and Sd = CSC'
  • From: sylwia . w
• Counting question about Hearts
  • From: dale . goodman
• Re: Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: m00es, Illywhacker, O'Hara, and Afonso are like Internet Cafe attandants
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: m00es, Illywhacker, O'Hara, and Afonso are like Internet Cafe attandants
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: wojciech
• Re: Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: mo44
• Re: m00es, Illywhacker, O'Hara, and Afonso are like Internet Cafe attandants
  • From: espyrian
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: Reef Fish
• m00es, Illywhacker, O'Hara, and Afonso are like Internet Cafe attandants
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Total-probability rule
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" is NOT for the Severely Humor Impaired
  • From: Reef Fish
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" : Applied Simple Regression
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Some of Reef Fish's behavior MUST NEVER AGAIN BE TOLERATED
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Applied Simple Regression
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Applied Simple Regression
  • From: Reef Fish
• RF's First Conjecture: m00es is Afonso III reincarnated
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Applied Simple Regression
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: 1X4 chi-square alternative
  • From: Peter Wing Larsen
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Another attempt to clear this up
  • From: m00es
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: m00es
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: m00es
• Re: A simple answer for someone as obtuse as Illywhacker
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Minimum description length
  • From: datamatter
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: kenneth_m_lin
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Anon.
• Geary Test : critical values
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: NEGATIVE HYPERGEOMETIC DISTRIBUTION
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: A simple answer for someone as obtuse as Illywhacker
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: nearest neighbor and clustering
  • From: Reef Fish
• A simple question for someone as clever as RF
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: junk6
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Another attempt to clear this up
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Gaussian bidimensional
  • From: David Jones
• Re: nearest neighbor and clustering
  • From: David Jones
• Total-probability rule
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: basic regression question
  • From: richardstartz
• Re: nearest neighbor and clustering
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: basic regression question
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• Re: nearest neighbor and clustering
  • From: Art Kendall
• Gaussian bidimensional
  • From: bise79
• Re: Another attempt to clear this up
  • From: m00es
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: m00es
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: m00es
• Re: Minimum description length
  • From: Graham Jones
• Re: test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: David Jones
• Re: test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: basic regression question
  • From: Anon.
• Computer for Statistical Analysis
  • From: wojciech
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Anon.
• Re: basic regression question
  • From: sab_ya
• nearest neighbor and clustering
  • From: b83503104@xxxxxxxxx
• hi
  • From: nakisa
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Minimum description length
  • From: datamatter
• NEGATIVE HYPERGEOMETIC DISTRIBUTION
  • From: Alon
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Anon.
• Re: test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Help Urgent !!
  • From: jon
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS: HOFOSQ, HOSOSQ
  • From: Reef Fish
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" new edition autographed by OLD Afonso!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Another attempt to clear this up
  • From: Russell
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: REEF FISH *TEACH US* Hypotheses Tests
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: Klaus
• Re: test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Coin flips and probability of range of heads
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: David Jones
• Re: test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: Klaus
• Re: REEF FISH *TEACH US* Hypotheses Tests
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: m00es
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: m00es
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Inf
• Re: REEF FISH *TEACH US* Hypotheses Tests
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS
  • From: Anon.
• Re: WHO CAN REPROVE MATTHIAS´s DECISION?
  • From: Reef Fish
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" 2nd Edition is Out!!
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: WHO CAN REPROVE MATTHIASīs DECISION?
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• REEF FISH *TEACH US* Hypotheses Tests
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: basic regression question
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• basic regression question
  • From: sab_ya
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS
  • From: Jay Cole
• Re: Good Bye
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Acronyms recognizable by STATISTICIANS.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: David A. Heiser
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS
  • From: John Herman
• Re: Minimum description length
  • From: Graham Jones
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Validation? C.Values are modified!
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: interpreting sign of t-value
  • From: Paige Miller
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: m00es
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: m00es
• Re: Rainfall statistics
  • From: quebecstat
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Raja
• Re: Good Bye
  • From: Fan of Bob
• Re: Acronyms recognizable by STATISTICIANS.
  • From: Fan of Bob
• Re: Acronyms recognizable by STATISTICIANS.
  • From: Anon.
• Re: WHO CAN REPROVE MATTHIAS´s DECISION?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: An open letter to Reef Fish
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: interpreting sign of t-value
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Good Bye
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Good Bye
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: An open letter to Reef Fish
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: junk6
• interpreting sign of t-value
  • From: nymphnode
• Acronyms recognizable by STATISTICIANS.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Raja
• WHO CAN REPROVE MATTHIAS´s DECISION?
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: 1X4 chi-square alternative
  • From: Anon.
• 1X4 chi-square alternative
  • From: mrwawa
• Re: An open letter to Reef Fish
  • From: TomC
• Re: Statistical ACRONYMS
  • From: Jay Cole
• Re: Minimum description length
  • From: illywhacker
• An open letter to Reef Fish
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Does Reefer know any math beyond elementary calculus?
  • From: Anon.
• Hellinger differentiality of 2-parameter Weibull family.
  • From: J.M. Moon
• Good Bye
  • From: Matthias Klaey
• Statistical ACRONYMS
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Coin flips and probability of range of heads
  • From: shepherdmoon
• Re: RF does not know that MAP = posterior mode
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• RF does not know that MAP = posterior mode
  • From: illywhacker
• Relationship between pearson's correlation coeffcient and sigma
  • From: Raja
• m00es TAKE NOTE
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Does Reefer know any math beyond elementary calculus?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Call for READERS to explain ASSUMPTION VALIDATION to m00es
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Does Reefer know any math beyond elementary calculus?
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Call for READERS to explain ASSUMPTION VALIDATION to m00es
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• Re: Does Reefer know any math beyond elementary calculus?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Call for READERS to explain ASSUMPTION VALIDATION to m00es
  • From: richardstartz
• Re: Call for READERS to explain ASSUMPTION VALIDATION to m00es
  • From: Kevin E. Thorpe
• help Probability Problem
  • From: Andrea
• Re: Coin flips and probability of range of heads
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Lou Thraki
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Re: Coin flips and probability of range of heads
  • From: Anon.
• Coin flips and probability of range of heads
  • From: shepherdmoon
• Re: Does Reefer know any math beyond elementary calculus?
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Rainfall statistics
  • From: quebecstat
• Minimum description length
  • From: datamatter
• Re: Rainfall statistics
  • From: quebecstat
• Re: Rainfall statistics
  • From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Rainfall statistics
  • From: quebecstat
• Re: Does Reefer know any math beyond elementary calculus?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Time to failure problem
  • From: robert . dodier
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Lou Thraki
• Re: Does Reefer know any math beyond elementary calculus?
  • From: Reef Fish
• History of Illywhacker's ERRORS and False Accusations in the "Highest Posterior Density" thread
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Does Reefer know any math beyond elementary calculus?
  • From: illywhacker
• History of Illywhacker's posts on the Bayesian "Highest Posterior Density" thread
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Help Urgent !!
  • From: Darth
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Hoeffding's inequality
  • From: ALiX
• Reefer fails to read posts again
  • From: illywhacker
• Reefer fails to read posts again
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Univariate Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Where it all began: Illywhacker's lack of understanding about Bayesian inference
  • From: Reef Fish
• Univariate Analysis
  • From: Rishi
• normally distributed
  • From: Ethan.Johnsons@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where it all began: Illywhacker's lack of understanding about Bayesian inference
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Where it all began: Illywhacker's lack of understanding about Bayesian inference
  • From: illywhacker
• Where it all began: Illywhacker's lack of understanding about Bayesian inference
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Where it all began: RF's foolish suggestion
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Power Analysis and Multiple Regression and Indifference
  • From: Reef Fish
• Where it all began: Illywhacker's lack of understanding about Bayesian inference
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Where it all began: RF's foolish suggestion
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Inf
• Re: Power Analysis and Multiple Regression and Indifference
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: MCMC, was What do you mean when you say you don't know anything about the parameter p of a Binomial distribution?
  • From: tsdev
• Re: "Double" lottery winner
  • From: ZenBug
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Re: Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Z = U(0,1)*N(0,1) + U(0,1)*N(0,1) + ... + U(0,1)*N(0,1) is distributed how?
  • From: liam_herron
• Re: I have Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Time to failure problem
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: Where it all began: RF's foolish suggestion
  • From: Lou Thraki
• Re: Testing hypothesis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Illywhacler's posting Profile in Google newsgroups
  • From: Reef Fish
• Signal vs NOISE in sci.stat.math Oct 1-12.
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Testing hypothesis
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Illywhacler's posting Profile in Google newsgroups
  • From: illywhacker
• Where it all began: RF's foolish suggestion
  • From: illywhacker
• Illywhacler's posting Profile in Google newsgroups
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Let's stop this nonsense
  • From: Reef Fish
• Let's stop this nonsense (again)
  • From: illywhacker
• Let's stop this nonsense
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Donald the Welder vs Bob the Fake Professor
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Illywhacker continues to Whack, Whack. Whack. ...and Whack some more
  • From: Reef Fish
• Donald the Welder vs Bob the Fake Professor
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Illywhacker continues to Whack, Whack. Whack. ...and Whack some more
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Illywhacker and FORGER stalker nasty_nassau_grouper
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: MCMC, was What do you mean when you say you don't know anything about the parameter p of a Binomial distribution?
  • From:
• Re: Illywhacker and FORGER stalker nasty_nassau_grouper
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: MCMC, was What do you mean when you say you don't know anything about the parameter p of a Binomial distribution?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: MCMC, was What do you mean when you say you don't know anything about the parameter p of a Binomial distribution?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: MCMC, was What do you mean when you say you don't know anything about the parameter p of a Binomial distribution?
  • From:
• MCMC, was What do you mean when you say you don't know anything about the parameter p of a Binomial distribution?
  • From: tsdev
• Illywhacker and FORGER stalker nasty_nassau_grouper
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Time to failure problem
  • From: Nicbrez
• Re: Time to failure problem
  • From: Old Mac User
• Robert's Who's Who of Lame
  • From: Robert F Ling
• Nasty_nassau_grouper FORGED for Illywhacker
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Econometrics: predictability in a nonlinear in mean model of financial returns
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Time to failure problem
  • From: Nicbrez
• Who's Who of Lame
  • From: Robert F Ling
• Re: Illywhacker caught LYING about his Who's Who invitation
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Illywhacker continues to Whack, Whack. Whack. ...and Whack some more
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Illywhacker caught LYING about his Who's Who invitation
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: I have Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: Anna Maria
• Illywhacker caught LYING about his Who's Who invitation
  • From: Reef Fish
• Illywhacker caught LYING about his Who's Who invitation
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Time to failure problem
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: Time to failure problem
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: Power Analysis and Multiple Regression and Indifference
  • From: Ben-Bard
• Re: Power Analysis and Multiple Regression and Indifference
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: Power Analysis and Multiple Regression and Indifference
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Illywhacker continues to Whack, Whack. Whack. ...and Whack some more
  • From: Reef Fish
• Power Analysis and Multiple Regression and Indifference
  • From: Ben-Bard
• Re: Illywhacker continues to Whack, Whack. Whack. ...and Whack some more
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Help Urgent !!
  • From: jon
• Re: test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: Eric B
• Illywhacker continues to Whack, Whack. Whack. ...and Whack some more
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Time to failure problem
  • From: Nic Brereton
• test difference Kurtosis and skewness
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Help Urgent !!
  • From: Darth
• Econometrics: predictability in a nonlinear in mean model of financial returns
  • From: Henri Courant Junior
• Re: What do you mean when you say you don't know anything about the parameter p of a Binomial distribution?
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• What do you mean when you say you don't know anything about the parameter p of a Binomial distribution?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Lou Thraki
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: irmddj
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: irmddj
• Re: Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Constructing a single MLE for multiple dependent error models
  • From: irmddj
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: evaluation of GLM by ROC analysis
  • From: Frank E Harrell Jr
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: evaluation of GLM by ROC analysis
  • From: sorench
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Kurtosis, Skewness and the Cummulant Generating Function
  • From: David Jones
• Re: p-value and prediction
  • From: David Jones
• Re: "Double" lottery winner
  • From: kenneth_m_lin
• 8th MISQUOTE by illywhacker in his 6 itemized points
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: lesliecaryn
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: lesliecaryn
• Re: Coin flipping
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: Larry Curcio
• M/M/1 waiting time, basic question
  • From: Georg
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Lilliefors´s Test : FRESH critical values
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Anon.
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Highest Posterior Density
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: dave
• Re: Coin flipping
  • From: xhoster
• Re: Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: Scott Seidman
• Re: Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: Scott Seidman
• Re: Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: dave
• Re: Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: Scott Seidman
• Re: Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: Larry Curcio
• Inferences concerning linear functions of the Model Parameters: Multiple Linear Regression
  • From: Stratocaster
• Re: 4 parameter beta equivalence
  • From: Samik R.
• Re: 4 parameter beta equivalence
  • From: Lou Thraki
• Re: 4 parameter beta equivalence
  • From: Samik R.
• Re: Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: dave
• Re: evaluation of GLM by ROC analysis
  • From: Frank E Harrell Jr
• Re: Relationshop between Skewness and Kurtosis
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: 4 parameter beta equivalence
  • From: Lou Thraki
• Interesting (?) Property of Least Square Line Fit to Evenly-Spaced Data.
  • From: Larry Curcio
• 4 parameter beta equivalence
  • From: Samik R.
• evaluation of GLM by ROC analysis
  • From: sorench
• Highest Posterior Density
  • From: AB
• p-value and prediction
  • From: tripacer
• Re: correlation and probability
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Predictive distribution
  • From: Anon.
• Re: correlation and probability
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Accounting for Differences in Sample Size
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: correlation and probability
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Importing a Excel file to Mat Lab
  • From: beliavsky
• Kurtosis, Skewness and the Cummulant Generating Function
  • From: Jonas
• Importing a Excel file to Mat Lab
  • From: Nishant
• Appending the Mat files
  • From: Nishant
• Accounting for Differences in Sample Size
  • From: Caliber
• correlation and probability
  • From: Bruno Panetta
• Predictive distribution
  • From: pekkajarvela
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: probability question
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: chi-squared question
  • From: Anon.
• Re: probability question
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: probability question
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: probability question
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: probability question
  • From: abose
• Re: probability question
  • From: abose
• Re: probability question
  • From: abose
• Re: probability question
  • From: abose
• Re: Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Testing Correlations
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Relationshop between Skewness and Kurtosis
  • From: Stephen Clark
• Re: Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Applied Simple Regression
  • From: Russell . Martin
• probability question
  • From: joseph Frank
• Re: Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Testing Correlations
  • From: Lou Thraki
• Re: Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Applied Simple Regression
  • From: TomC
• chi-squared question
  • From: bm459
• Re: Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Testing Correlations
  • From: Russell . Martin
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: me13013
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: me13013
• Re: Relationshop between Skewness and Kurtosis
  • From: David Jones
• Relationshop between Skewness and Kurtosis
  • From: benoit labit
• Re: Scores in SPPS Principal Component Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: me13013
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Reef Fish Statistics for Dummies: Applied Simple Regression
  • From: Reef Fish
• "Double" lottery winner
  • From: Zenbug
• Re: PCA correlation and covariance
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: PCA correlation and covariance
  • From: arossnagel
• Re: testing difference in groups of observations with known error on each observation
  • From: Ray Koopman
• skewness and kurtosis
  • From: joseph Frank
• testing difference in groups of observations with known error on each observation
  • From: Ned
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: me13013
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Random Walk and Bronian Motion
  • From: cuforward
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
• Re: PCA correlation and covariance
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: UMP test for two-sided hypothesis
  • From: Lou Thraki
• Re: Scores in SPPS Principal Component Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• PCA correlation and covariance
  • From: arossnagel
• Re: Scores in SPPS Principal Component Analysis
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: Ramesh Rebba
• Dr. Doofus, could I have a solution manual?
  • From: Juan Li
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: daniel_nordlund_1982
• Re: Scores in SPPS Principal Component Analysis
  • From: pekkajarvela
• Re: simple way to update the inverse of the covariance matrix with each data point
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Scores in SPPS Principal Component Analysis
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: David Winsemius
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Test for uniform distribution for small sample size
  • From: me13013
• Re: Scores in SPPS Principal Component Analysis
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Scores in SPPS Principal Component Analysis
  • From: pekkajarvela
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: Reef Fish
• Wilcoxon rank-sum question
  • From: daniel_nordlund_1982
• UMP test for two-sided hypothesis
  • From: AB
• Re: AR modeling- should I use it?
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: simple way to update the inverse of the covariance matrix with each data point
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: integral
  • From: Inf
• Re: integral
  • From: kiru . sengal
• integral
  • From: llu
• Re: minimum mean square error for normal vectors
  • From: Ray Koopman
• minimum mean square error for normal vectors
  • From: VijaKhara
• Re: How to change a random sample rate?
  • From: Anon.
• Re: How to change a random sample rate?
  • From: Morgan Cheng
• Re: How to change a random sample rate?
  • From: Anon.
• How to change a random sample rate?
  • From: Morgan Cheng
• computing covariance from joint CDF and marginal CDF
  • From: regis lebrun
• population question
  • From: nelson
• similar ILP formulations, but very different complexity
  • From: thyeros.public@xxxxxxxxx
• "Photo of Dr. Luis Afonso and Bob Ling" posted by Jack Tomsky
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: simple way to update the inverse of the covariance matrix with each data point
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: BumbLING Bob Ling's photo
  • From: Nag
• Re: simple way to update the inverse of the covariance matrix with each data point
  • From: Ken Butler
• Re: BumbLING Bob Ling's photo
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: simple way to update the inverse of the covariance matrix with each data point
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
  • From: Anon.
• Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
  • From: Reef Fish
• AR modeling- should I use it?
  • From: kiwi
• Re: Sorting and testing multiple distributions
  • From: Philip R Kensche
• BumbLING Bob Ling's photo
  • From: Nag
• Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
  • From: Anon.
• BumbLING Bob Ling's rambLINGs
  • From: Nag
• BumbLING Bob Ling's rambLINGs
  • From: Nag
• Re: I have complete Solutions - Statistical Inference Casella & Berger
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: logistic skewed response
  • From: David Winsemius
• NAG, NAG, NAG. NAGGING
  • From: Reef Fish
• "Portuguese Statistics for Dummies" Sells BRISKLY
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Multivariate Analysis on Binomial Outcome?
  • From: David Winsemius
• NAG, NAG, NAG, NAGGING
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: The urn problem with weighed balls
  • From: Herman Rubin
• BumbLING Bob Ling's rambLINGs
  • From: Nag
• Correction of one Factoid about History of Nag1010@gmail.com
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: A NEW publication: "Finnish Statistics for Dummies".
  • From: Reef Fish
• Re: Some of Reef Fish's behavior MUST NEVER AGAIN BE TOLERATED
  • From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)