Re: Testing for normality
- From: "Reef Fish" <large_nassua_grouper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Oct 2006 18:55:03 -0700
"Luis A. Afonso" wrote:
A provisional list of the JR critical values:
Using
www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35b.htm
and the formula provided by the Marco.
__ n___c.v._____95%__________99%
__30__________4.02__________10.28
__35__________4.22__________10.72
__40__________4.41__________11.14
__45__________4.55__________11.38
__50__________4.65__________11.57
__55__________4.76__________11.73
__60__________4.84__________11.86
(frequencies based on 1million of samples for each size).
Comment
Marco, can you show me a more puerile-imbecile task than to provide an *infinite* number of decimal places concerning an erroneous approach, as chi-square (2 df) is to the JR statistics (Reef Fish gave)?
______licas (Luis A. Afonso)
Luis A. Afonso, I am afraid you're attributing what you called the
"erroneous approach, as in chi-square (2 df)" to the
WRONG "puerile-imbecil". It was given to you by your old
friend Jack Tomsky. I merely appended some related
remarks on Monte Carlo and quantile and probability
approximations to Jack's "imbecilic" remarks to you. :-)
BTW, Afonso, what are JR statistics?
-- Reef Fish Bob.
.
- References:
- Testing for normality
- From: Marco
- Re: Testing for normality
- From: \"Luis A. Afonso\"
- Testing for normality
- Prev by Date: Re: Assessing credibility of a q-q plot by presence of outliers
- Next by Date: Re: Signature analysis
- Previous by thread: Re: Testing for normality
- Next by thread: Re: Testing for normality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|