Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- From: "Reef Fish" <large_nassua_grouper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Oct 2006 09:14:04 -0700
Anon. wrote:
John Uebersax wrote:
Saludos Ruth!Shouldn't that just come from the likelihood? i.e. it should be in the
I have a probability on several parameters and one of them is
nuisance one. I want to margizalize over it by simply
integrating the probability along the whole range of values
that such nuisance parameter is allowed to take.
Okay good. You want to "integrate out a nuisance parameter."
Doing it that way is what people call using a flat prior?
I think possibly you're combining two different issues here.
A "prior distribution" is a Bayesian term, and means, basically,
what you think the distribution of a parameter is before
(prior to) some additional data or evidence leads you to
modify your prior beliefs (i.e., produce an updated, or
posterior estimate of the distribution).
So I think we should just dispense with the word "prior"
here. It seems like all you really want to know is: given
that I don't know the shape of my nuisance parameter
distribution, what's a good guess?
model already.
--
Bob O'Hara
You are ALMOST correct. That's why I said Uebersax is NOT a
Bayesian. We already know Bob O'Hara isn't one. :-)
The posterior distribution is the likelihood function if the prior is
"diffuse" (which is NOT the same as a "uniform" or "flat" prior).
For Bayesian Inference on the parameter p of a Binomial distribution
or a Bernoulli Process, the beta distribution is a member of the
conjugate prior family -- meaning both the prior AND posterior
belongs to the same distribution family -- Beta.
The uniform distribution on (0,1) is a Beta distribution with
parameters (1,1) and is an INFORMATIVE prior.
Beta(1/2, 3) is reverse J-shaped.
Beta(1/2, 1/2) is U-shaped, symmetric around 1/2.
Beta(2, 2) is symmetric unimodal, so is Beta(2,3).
Beta(2,1) is the triangular distribution on (0,1)
Beta(3,2) is unimodal, skewed to the left.
Beta(3,1) is J-shaped, so is Beta(2. 1/3).
As you can see, the Beta family CAN represent a wide
variety of opinion about p and hence is a reasonably
good APPROXIMATE prior distribution for one to choose
that best-reflects one's opinion, without having to do any
work on integration of the product of the prior and likelihood,
because the posterior distribution form can be written
IMMEDIATELY given the sample information.
That's the usefulness of a CONJUGATE prior on certain
problems (for Bayesians). However, even the family of
conjugate priors are grossly inadequate for a true Bayesian
for expressing his opinion about a particular p of a
Binomial. That's why Robert Schlaiffer had spent a large
amount of time providing numerical assessment software
and numerical integration software for just that ONE
problem (and other uniariate parameter problems) and
had written a book about it.
-- Reef Fish Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- From: David Winsemius
- Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- From: Anon.
- Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- References:
- different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- From: wtplasar@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- From: John Uebersax
- Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- From: Anon.
- different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- Prev by Date: CFP: CSNA 2007
- Next by Date: Re: Testing for normality
- Previous by thread: Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- Next by thread: Re: different priors (flat, uniform, etc)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading