Re: BY NO MEANS: Bob Ling - Jack Tomsky



Jack Tomsky - Bob Ling´s NEWS


The matter that matters is the problem under discussion. Jack Tomsky and Bob Ling are unable to answer to the direct question:
WHAT is your final conclusion?
_____p(y<15|x+y=16) as you stated
or p((x,y)|(x/n1-y/n2<=0)
X=Bin (pX, n1=10), Y=Bin(pY, n2=30) being X INDEPENDENT from Y: p(x,y)= p(x)*p(y)

Bob Ling: you are making NOISE in order not to misdirected people to the problem. THIS IS UNEFFECTIVE; we all got your scheme.
Once more I ask
Would you to *land* from you are and present solid and credible ARGUMENTATION pro your theses that the right solution is p(y<15|x+y=16), or give up all discussion in this grounds. Your evasive scheme is more and more evident for all of us: you have ANY valid argumentation to support your absolutely wrong solution. STOP YOUR ABUSIVE LANGUAGE and start to discuss the problem we are dealing with.


_____licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.



Relevant Pages