Re: percentiles estimation
- From: "ziqing" <chengxixin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Nov 2006 07:33:56 -0800
The estimation depends on the data.
If the data set is quite nice, say has a shape of known distribution,
using parametric method to estimate the distribution and calculating
the quantile of the fitted distribution would be better.
Or use smooth method like kernel estimate to smooth the data histogram.
The fast and dirty way is just use the quantile of the histogram as the
estimation.
Michel PETITJEAN wrote:
sci.stat.math
Subj: percentiles estimation
Having an empirical distribution x1,...,xn, and the order statistics
X1,...,Xn with, say, n=1000, which is the best estimator of
the percentile 90%:
X900, X901, (X900+X901)/2, or something else ?
Any reference will be appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Michel Petitjean, Email: petitjean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ITODYS (CNRS, UMR 7086) ptitjean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1 rue Guy de la Brosse Phone: +33 (0)1 44 27 48 57
75005 Paris, France. FAX : +33 (0)1 44 27 68 14
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.skewness.html
.
- References:
- percentiles estimation
- From: Michel PETITJEAN
- percentiles estimation
- Prev by Date: Re: F-test for comparing variances?
- Next by Date: Re: Google Group scistatmath
- Previous by thread: Re: percentiles estimation
- Next by thread: Markov Chain properties
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|