Re: quality control
- From: David Winsemius <doe_snot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:09:26 -0600
"Frank" <deps_bear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1163379604.737594.310650
@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
If I know a product fails .01% of the time and I have 1500 items I'm
running through a process. How many items do I need to check with,
say, 99% confidence that all the items are built correctly.
Think about it in simple terms. What would be the failure rate if only 1
out of 1500 failed. Once you look at that failure rate, you should should
ask youself whether there is any chance in Hades that you will ever be 99%
confident with any sample.
I'm thinking either Poison or Geometic distribution is applicable, but
what would the formula be. Also, what key words should I be searching
for. I know I've come across this problem many years ago but stuck on
finding where.
Its a binomial problem and the Poisson would be a good approximation, but
if that is really the problem, then it won't matter whether you use a
Poisson or a binomial. You will never get to power of 0.99 with anything
less that 100% sample.
--
David Winsemius
.
- References:
- quality control
- From: Frank
- quality control
- Prev by Date: quality control
- Next by Date: Re: quality control
- Previous by thread: quality control
- Next by thread: Re: quality control
- Index(es):
Loading