Re: Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- From: David Winsemius <doe_snot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:46:47 -0600
"Reef Fish" <large_nassua_grouper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1164375456.941624.6580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
The only person in this newsgroup who claimed to have usedNot necessarily the only one who ever used it, though.
the unbiased estimate for sigma was Jack Tomsky, who used it
in an indirect way, when he estimated the quantile of a
distribution.
http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/69/3/635?ijkey=65cc8fb6d7aa6e5ebece1ccac5c0164e1a2aeeab
On p 639 of this 1982 Biometrika paper, Frank Harrell used the same estimator
for comparison with a distribution-free quantile estimator.
--
David Winsemius
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: Old Mac User
- Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: Art Kendall
- Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: David Jones
- Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- From: Reef Fish
- Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- Prev by Date: 2 dimension Bayes rule?
- Next by Date: Retest estimation from the test-retest r?
- Previous by thread: Re: Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- Next by thread: Re: Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|