Re: Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- From: "Reef Fish" <large_nassua_grouper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Nov 2006 17:01:46 -0800
David Winsemius wrote:
"Reef Fish" <large_nassua_grouper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1164375456.941624.6580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
The only person in this newsgroup who claimed to have usedNot necessarily the only one who ever used it, though.
the unbiased estimate for sigma was Jack Tomsky, who used it
in an indirect way, when he estimated the quantile of a
distribution.
That is a really frivolous nit-pick on an obvious hyperbole, though
as stated, the hyperbole is beyond any valid nitpick!
Jack was the ONLY person in this newsgroup "who claimed to have
used the unbiased estimate of sigma".
Can you name anyone else who made such a claim in this newsgroup?
http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/69/3/635?ijkey=65cc8fb6d7aa6e5ebece1ccac5c0164e1a2aeeab
On p 639 of this 1982 Biometrika paper, Frank Harrell used the same estimator
for comparison with a distribution-free quantile estimator.
I am sure a few others did, after the paper in the American
Statistician
giving the unbiased estimator of sigma was around 1972. But for the
subject Harrell considered, the invariant MLE would have been a
much better choice as the estimator for comparison than an unbiased
estimator because it made Harrell's result WRONG everywhere
except in the unit he chose to investigate (because of the lack of
the invariance property of MLE), or as a measure-theorist would say,
his comparative result was valid on a set of measure ZERO. ;-)
But the POINT I think I have made, with adequate supporting reasons,
is the SILLINESS of over-stressing the importance (or any importance)
of the criterion of "unbiasedness", when the most commonly used
(and frequently used) estimate for sigma is the biased sample
standard deviation s.
Reef Fish Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: Old Mac User
- Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: Art Kendall
- Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- From: David Jones
- Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- From: Reef Fish
- Re: Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- From: David Winsemius
- Unusual formulae for confidence intervals
- Prev by Date: Re: Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- Next by Date: Re: Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic looking for mathematicians
- Previous by thread: Re: Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- Next by thread: Re: Corollary: N-P Silliness in Estimation Theory (was: Re: Unusual formulae for confidence intervals)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|