Re: Editorial: Guiness World Record for the shortest lived moderated group, "scistatmath"?

Reef Fish wrote:
Lou Thraki wrote:
Reef Fish wrote:
Beliavsky wrote:
Reef Fish obviously has too much time on his hands and has posted many
more messages about the scistatmath Google Group than I have.

And I have posted at least 30 times as many posts in STATISTICS in
the sci.stat.* groups since Feb 2005 than you have.

So maybe you deserve a place in the Guiness Book of Records ;-)

Smiley noted.

Actually no. If you knew how to use Google to do the necessary
research,
you would have known that I am not even in the top list of "most
frequent
posters" in USENET newsgroups, not even the top 100, or perhaps the
top 1000. I KNOW some of these "most frequent posters" not only by
their
posting names, but some of them have over 100 posting ALIAS names. :-)

ALL of my posts in sci.stat.math (including those AGAINST the quackery
and malpractice of others) are of STATISTICAL substance, or about
statsitical substance (as in the present Editorial thread).

You or anyone else is more than welcome to question any of my posts for
statistical content, as Greg Heath just did,

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I TOLD YOU NOT TO DO.

IT IS A LOW-LIFE, UNSCRUPULOUS, UNETHICAL
APROACH.

AGAIN, FOR THE FOURTH TIME:

I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH DIRECT REPLIES TO
MY POSTS.

HOWEVER,

DO NOT MENTION MY NAME, BEHIND MY BACK,
IN A THREAD THAT DOES NOT CONTAIN MY
PARTICIPATION.

THANK YOU!

GREG HEATH

.

Relevant Pages