Re: Editorial: Guiness World Record for the shortest lived moderated group, "scistatmath"?

Reef Fish wrote:
Greg Heath wrote:
Reef Fish wrote:
Lou Thraki wrote:
Reef Fish wrote:
Beliavsky wrote:
Reef Fish obviously has too much time on his hands and has posted many
more messages about the scistatmath Google Group than I have.

And I have posted at least 30 times as many posts in STATISTICS in
the sci.stat.* groups since Feb 2005 than you have.

So maybe you deserve a place in the Guiness Book of Records ;-)

Smiley noted.

ALL of my posts in sci.stat.math (including those AGAINST the quackery
and malpractice of others) are of STATISTICAL substance, or about
statsitical substance (as in the present Editorial thread).

You or anyone else is more than welcome to question any of my posts for
statistical content, as Greg Heath just did,

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I TOLD YOU NOT TO DO.

Greg, NOBODY tells me what to do or what to do.

What about what not to do?

Reef, you are beginning this post with a bold-faced lie.

ANYONE can tell you what to do or what not to do.

Put some thought into your sentences. However, why
should I expect you to do that when you don't put any
thought into interpreting the sentences of others.

Your head is getting
over-swollen in the thread ridiculing Stephen Hershkorn.

Except for using the term "self-proclaimed", I thought the
remainder of the exchange was rather civil.

You had
REQUESTED that I don't mention you among other well-known noise
makers and statistical Quacks in this group, at the time you seemed to
have REFORMED, by sticking to things that you knew something about
rather than making blunders like you had been doing before.

I had honored your request NOT to mention you as one of the most
frequent NOISE makers (even though you had clearly been one), and
that was why in the SECOND post of this thread, I mentioned ALL the
well-known NOISE BULLYs in sci.stat.math, EXCEPT Greg Heath:

RF> m00es is gone. Afonso is still posting in the Math Forum, but is
no
RF> longer visible in sci.stat.math. Illywhacker's noise is gone
since
RF> Oct 19, more than a month ago, Anon Bob O'Hara has finally learned
RF> to keep his mouth shut on subject he knows nothing abot; and
RF> Richard Ulrich is still around making his usual noise, but his
NOISE
RF> has been drowned out by FACTS that it was him who had been
RF> making all the noise.

Reef, there is no useful purpose to any of those sentences.
Regular readers of the group know whos advice is always good,
good most of the time, good some of the time, and is never good.
In addition, it doesn't take long for new readers to reach that level
of understanding. A self-proclaimed watch dog is unnecessary.

If you disappeared, bad advice would invoke correcting
replies from others and the sun would still come up tomorrow.

Reef, face the music:

You are not only unnecessary, you are also insufficient.

IT IS A LOW-LIFE, UNSCRUPULOUS, UNETHICAL APROACH.

For putting you BACK on the list

No, for mentioning my name, behind my back, in a thread in which
I had not posted.

when you were back to your BAD
behavior or not only making errors (in the Jerry/Hershkorn/Heath
thread), but re-started being a SMART ASS (I had called you a "wise
dockey"

Boy, aren't you clever...and what a vocabulary! I don't
even know what a dockey is.

in that thread when you made your gratuitous NOISE for
the 3rd and 4th time.

AGAIN, FOR THE FOURTH TIME:

It doesn't matter,Greg, HOW MANY time you make your NOISE --
you have blown your own cover. You have lost what I had kindly
granted you -- now you'll be reminded that you had been one of
the WORST noise makers in the history of sci.stat.math during my
presence since early 2005.

Coming from you, that could be considered a compliment.

I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH DIRECT REPLIES TO
MY POSTS.

I pointed out your ERRORS in the Jerry/Herschkorn/Heath thread.
Everyone had been silent about the error except Greg Heath who
made not just ONE NOISY POST:

GH> Welcome to the thread, provided you have something
GH> useful to add.

GH> And now Reef Fish is wrong because he professes
GH> to know the answer when he is just guessing and
GH> crossing his fingers so that he can boost his number
GH> of posting counts up by 1.

But a SECOND post, after my explanation of Greg's error
about the properties of an "independent variable" in regression:

GH> However, you blew it by just trying to use the post
GH> to up your posting count (which for some reason
GH> is is very important to you).

and a THIRD,

RF> that's what everyone (not necessarily Jerry) who tries
RF> to help him SHOULD know, because it had been posted
RF> over and over again, in lengthy threads in sci.stat.math.

Greg Heath did no better then trying to cover his OWN error
by suggesting implying that HE should not need to know that
the independent variables are NOT stochastically independent

Greg didn't imply that. Reef erroneously inferred that.

after I pointed out 10 length threads in the Google archives
that were hits on the search of "linear independence and
stochastic independence" with Reef Fish being the author.

GH> It was simply a question of what Jerry meant, not what
GH> every one should know.

and now up to the 4th, 5th, and more, spreading over a different
thread (this one) on beliavsky and scistatmath.

HOWEVER,

DO NOT MENTION MY NAME, BEHIND MY BACK,

You are such a SILLY, bloated block-head that you call my PUBLIC
posting a mention of your name "behind your back"?

I have no reason to read all posts in this group. I do read followups
to posts in which I create or reply. Gratuitously mentioning my
name in another thread in which I took no part is the low-life,
unscupulous and unethical act of a pompous blow-hard.

Reef, you may be a good scuba diver, however, you can't
walk on water.

You are so delusional that even Stephen Hershkorn said of you
while you were ridiculing HIM (when YOU were making the same error)

SH on GH> Touchy, Touchy!

Reef, get your facts straight. That was my reply to him!

Should I attribute that ERROR to a deteriorating photographic
memory or some other mental defect?

IN A THREAD THAT DOES NOT CONTAIN MY
PARTICIPATION.

GREG HEATH

Greg, henceforth, I can name you as a NOISE maker of sci.stat.math
ANYTIME I feel it's in CONTEXT of what I post, because you had given
uneqivocal proof in the sci.stat.math archives that you ARE one of the
WORSE noise makers, besides being ignorant about various matters
relating to the regression topic!

You NOISE even went so far as polluting THIS thread which is about
the noise makers in sci.stat.math and the spectacular failure of
belieavsky's plagiarised Google group scistatmath.

Greg Heath's ERRORS are FACTS (forever recorded in the Google
archives) that anyone can see!

Live with them, Greg.

Reef, I can live with my real errors (different than those fabricated
or fantasized by you).

Unfortunately, you have to live with yourself.

Have a good day.

Greg

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gary Coward
    ... Collard, for a genius, you sure do and say some pretty stupid things. ... First on the list of dumbass things that you do is filtering Brian. ... supposed super-high noise ratio yet, ... Brian is responsible for 99% of the on topic posts here, ...
    (rec.gambling.sports)
  • Re: Tom Kunich
    ... > stalking for all the bandwidth destroyed. ... > wasn't just stupid crap like he posts now. ... I have a question, Tom. ... Signal or noise, Tom? ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • My Subjective Assessment of the current frequent posters in sci.stat.math
    ... a few of Afonso's posts, and I also followed up on posts of ALL of the ... RF> NOISE generated by Luis A. Afonso single-handedly. ... which of the three Faces was posting. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: OT: Whatever happened to Sheila (whats her name)?
    ... happen eventually if the OT noise is allowed to grow unabated. ... unless the group specifically allows OT posts. ... It may well be that rec eq's charter does permit OT posts. ... even the "trolls", I simply ignore and don't read what I don't want to. ...
    (rec.equestrian)
  • Re: Some of Reef Fishs behavior MUST NEVER AGAIN BE TOLERATED
    ... subject headers talks about comparing what I said a year ago with what ... Reef Fish's belittling of other people is OUTRAGEOUS and UNACCEPTABLE. ... Most of his posts required no ... of The American Statistician, ...
    (sci.stat.math)