Re: test for small paired sample size
- From: "Anon." <bob.ohara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:16:40 +0200
Knut Krueger wrote:
Hi to allWell you could do an ANCOVA, and the p-value for the slope being different is just under 0.05. But quite frankly, I would tell the journal to sod off if they insist on p-values, and suggest that the editors learn to use their common sense (hmm, I might not express it in quite those terms, though). Just be clear that any test is not justified, because of the small sample size.
is there any meaningful analysis for the following data:
a: 62 57 230
b: 10587 5721 3550
we have only three pairs of data and everybody can realize that "a" is
increasing and "b" is decreasing. But is there any statistical function
for such a small sample size to get any "p-value" (for the journals...)
Bob
--
Bob O'Hara
Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics
P.O. Box 68 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2b)
FIN-00014 University of Helsinki
Finland
Telephone: +358-9-191 51479
Mobile: +358 50 599 0540
Fax: +358-9-191 51400
WWW: http://www.RNI.Helsinki.FI/~boh/
Journal of Negative Results - EEB: http://www.jnr-eeb.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: test for small paired sample size
- From: Adam
- Re: test for small paired sample size
- References:
- test for small paired sample size
- From: Knut Krueger
- test for small paired sample size
- Prev by Date: test for small paired sample size
- Next by Date: Re: Comparing fractions (or proportions)
- Previous by thread: test for small paired sample size
- Next by thread: Re: test for small paired sample size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|