Re: Effect sizes for Friedman's ANOVA
- From: Ollie <omairess@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:03:40 EST
In the previous reply the symbols weren't printed so the expression is as follows:
rho=sqrt(Chi²(1)/N) and it seems to be larger than one for some of my variables.
Maybe I am mistaken in the way to compute N.
Rosenthal considers N to be the "size of the study" or 'other sampling units'. Does this means that in a repeated measures design
N = (k*n)
with k= number of repetitions and n the number of subjects????
or is it simply the number of subjects???
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Effect sizes for Friedman's ANOVA
- From: Ray Koopman
- Re: Effect sizes for Friedman's ANOVA
- From: m00es
- Re: Effect sizes for Friedman's ANOVA
- References:
- Effect sizes for Friedman's ANOVA
- From: Ollie
- Effect sizes for Friedman's ANOVA
- Prev by Date: Align Friedman ranks for univariate repeated measures
- Next by Date: Re: Statistical Conventions in Social Science papers?
- Previous by thread: Re: Effect sizes for Friedman's ANOVA
- Next by thread: Re: Effect sizes for Friedman's ANOVA
- Index(es):