Re: Bob Ling´s ignorance is clear

As long as OMU uses dilactoris tactics for not to solve the problems I posed all kind of discussions, are useless. The trick has clearly that goal.
The 2 problems are rigorously posed (Posted: Jan 14, 2007 3:04 AM) in respect to an OMU ´s asking for NUMERICAL DATA, H0 and respective Confidence Levels.
IS HE ABLE TO DO SOLVE THEM?

The following text is a complete NONSENSE:


*** My attempts at explaining certain basic facts to Afonso failed miserably. He still doesn't understand the basic concept of beginning with the conjecture that two sources of data may have the same true average or the same frequency of outcomes and working forward from there. Anything I might do to explain this in new and different ways would be lost in the noise. Afonso's free education came to an abrupt halt on 1/1/07. Maybe someone else wants to pick up the flag and try. And try. And try. And try. OMU***

1) BY THE HELLWHERE I DENNIED THAT two sources of data could have the SAME TRUE AVERAGE? I simply can assert if THAT is admissible (from the observed data) or unlikely.
2) Clearly OMU does not want to enter on the discussion REALM. Obviously he uses personal (arbitrary) prejudicing (and rhetoric) *noise* in order to avoid (incompetence or bad faith?) to go further.

His insistence is a clear mark how he thinks that the *normal approximation* is the best we can do in order to compare two INDEPENDENT proportions.



______licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.