Re: Interpreting the coefficient in a GLS binomial model
- From: Serguei Kaniovski <kaniovsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:30:09 EST
With 9 jurors there will be BIN(9,2), or 36 different pairs. The data looks like:
j_pair,count_C,count_O,index
were "j_pair" is a pair of jurors, "count_C" the number of concurring votes, "count_O" the number of dissenting votes, "index" the distance. Concurring votes are more probable then the dissenting votes because the Yes-votes are positively correlated. It is simple to show that No-No votes are then also positively correlated, and Yes-No, No-Yes votes are negatively correlated. Moreover,
corr{yes_yes}=corr(no-no)=-corr(yes,no)=-corr(no,yes)
Serguei
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interpreting the coefficient in a GLS binomial model
- From: David Winsemius
- Re: Interpreting the coefficient in a GLS binomial model
- References:
- Re: Interpreting the coefficient in a GLS binomial model
- From: David Winsemius
- Re: Interpreting the coefficient in a GLS binomial model
- Prev by Date: Kruskal-Wallis statistics and Chi squared critical values
- Next by Date: marginal (loglinear) models
- Previous by thread: Re: Interpreting the coefficient in a GLS binomial model
- Next by thread: Re: Interpreting the coefficient in a GLS binomial model
- Index(es):