Re: The Principal/Principle Component Confusion
- From: "Nick" <tulse04-news1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:22:30 -0000
"Joel Daniels" <jdaniel4@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1172021463.392117.297640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A-parent-lee we cud use sum more general aide-you-caution.
Even UCL ("London's Global University") failed to write it rightly:
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/oncology/MicroCore/HTML_resource/PCA_1.htm
Interestingly the above gives a link to
http://kybele.psych.cornell.edu/~edelman/Psych-465-Spring-2003/PCA-tutorial.pdf
which does spell it correctly.
I suppose the fact is that being good at English is not a prerequisite for
being good at maths.
Indeed I knew a fellow who went to Cambridge to study Maths who had the
utmost difficulty in obtaining the necessary English Language pass at high
school which is (certainly was) the prerequisite to being admitted to any
English university.
Nick
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Sampling method
- Next by Date: Re: The Principal/Principle Component Confusion
- Previous by thread: statistics, distributions.
- Next by thread: Re: The Principal/Principle Component Confusion
- Index(es):