Re: JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- From: "Luis A. Afonso" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:15:57 EDT
I wrote:
JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
Only an absolute ignorant in the Hypotheses Test matter thinks the following
1) Your assertion that Hypotheses tests and Court Trials are the same thing,
2) Your belief that the Null Hypotheses could be find being really true (or the alternative one),
3) The belief that the null hypotheses are true equalities, not the statement that is not sufficient evidence the concerned parameters are different. They are CONCEPTS not merely term generalizations, not a Byzantine *nickpick* but really just within the realm of the matter to which none is allowed to hesitate. Note that in a) the persecutor´s identity switch, if detected, we prove H0, a *forbidden* situation in Hypotheses Test Is surely on his matters Jack Tomsky should rethink urgently.***
To which Tomsky replied:
Thanks for listing points which everyone except you agree on.
Jack***
My reply
IN FACT *tout le monde * is well aware that (even the biologists)
a) Only apparently court trials and hypotheses tests are similar,
b) ANY hypotheses is proved by tests: they are merely a tool to find out if
____there are sufficient evidence (based on data) to reject H0, or are not. The first result leads us to conserve H0 (but we are not allowed to declare that H0 is true, NEVER). The second leads to state that *there is sufficient evidence of do not accept H0*, but at the chosen significance level: if you shorten it successively you will find a value to which you accept H0.
This dission can be seen in the WEB, find it Tomsky.
c) Consequently the *algebraic notation* in H0 concerning the parameters *equality* are misleading only to uneducated people, like Jack, the others shall read *not sufficient evidence , at the chosen significance level to distinguish the parameter´s values.
THAT´s ALL, FOLKS
(Thank you Jack Tomsky by your clear statement that you belief in that nonsense, because now is clear , indisputably clear, that you are a ZERO on Hypotheses Tests.
_______licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- From: Jack Tomsky
- Re: JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- References:
- JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- Prev by Date: Re: Positive Correlation and User Surveys
- Next by Date: Re: JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- Previous by thread: Re: JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- Next by thread: Re: JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|