THE THIRD...
- From: "Luis A. Afonso" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:32:57 EDT
From HyperStat:(It is the THIRD, to agree with me, therefore slashing Jack)
*** It would not have been correct to say that there was no difference between the performance of the two groups. There was a difference. It is just that the difference was not large enough to rule out chance as an explanation of the difference. It would also have been incorrect to imply that there is no difference in the population. Be sure not to accept the null hypothesis. ***
________licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: THE THIRD...
- From: Richard Atkins
- Re: THE THIRD...
- References:
- JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about negative values in rotated matrix in factor analysis?
- Next by Date: Uncertainty in extrapolated values
- Previous by thread: Re: JACK TOMSKY: an HISTORIAL of nonsense
- Next by thread: Re: THE THIRD...
- Index(es):