Re: WHY IS SOUND to get C.V.´s from Mont Carlo
- From: "Luis A. Afonso" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:07:12 EDT
You are so… that you profit a clear misprint to blame me. You know VERY WELL that my data was originated from U(0,1) as I posted before and you was persuaded that you should use 1.960 at +/- z/sqrt(n).
And you claim that you are a decent person! A decent person, you are not, sure.
You have not sufficient moral category to teach. I never met before (except Bob Ling) such a disgusting person. True.
YOU KNEW VERY WELL THAT I SIMULATE UNIFORM DATA. VERY WELL.
********
And about the REAL QUESTION OF THIS DISCUSSION: are simulations able to reach the critical values of sample statistics or you maintain (against the FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF STATISTICS) they are not?
Read this point urgently PROFESSOR.
And about poitwise and uniform convergence, TOO.
__________licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WHY IS SOUND to get C.V.´s from Mont Carlo
- From: Jack Tomsky
- Re: WHY IS SOUND to get C.V.´s from Mont Carlo
- Prev by Date: SOLVE IT
- Next by Date: ARML 2003 Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: WHY IS SOUND to get C.V.´s from Mont Carlo
- Next by thread: Re: WHY IS SOUND to get C.V.´s from Mont Carlo
- Index(es):