JACK DOES NOT USE PROBABILITY TABLES!



JACK DOES NOT USE PROBABILITY TABLES!



A straightforward conclusion we have to reach is that Jack Tomsky NEVER consult a Table (such those appearing at the final of text-books) when he performs a Hypotheses Test and try to find its significance.

Why?
BECAUSE TABLES DISPLAY VALUES OF THE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION of the test statistics exactly those that are obtained by simulation. REMARK THAT HE CLAIMS THAT THE LAST ONES ARE NOT VALID (against the result of the Glivenko-Cantelli Theorem, the so-named Fundamental Theorem of Statistics).

What he does? MYSTERY!(Readers ask him, PLEASE)


__________licas (Luis A. Afonso)
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Binomial Distribution - Monte Carlo (I)
    ... Jack Tomsky wrote: ... SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL leads to ... could have rejected it with probability 1.0 by ignoring the data. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Am I using the z-table incorrectly?
    ... *** Jack Tomsky is completely right. ... Without that correction factor of ... the probability would not be invariant with ... WIKIPEDIA OR OTHER BIBLIOGRAPHY ELSE: ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: The latest Jack Tomsky BLUNDER (II)
    ... Jack Tomsky DOES NOT KNOW that a probability iworks on FORECASTING of random evens outputs. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • The latest Jack Tomsky BLUNDER (II)
    ... The latest Jack Tomsky BLUNDER ... Jack Tomsky DOES NOT KNOW that a probability works on FORECASTING random events outputs. ... The self - appointed moderator activity is a complete abusive appropriation; the OWNERS surely will not be praised towards this abusive action. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: The latest Jack Tomsky BLUNDER (II)
    ... Jack Tomsky DOES NOT KNOW that a probability iworks on FORECASTING of random evens outputs. ...
    (sci.stat.math)