Re: Jack Tomsky: NO WAY OFF



On Mar 31, 2:17 pm, "Luis A. Afonso" <lic...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jack Tomsky: NO WAY OFF

YOU HAVE NO WAY OFF

___OR
YOU PROVE THAT THE GLIVENKO-CANTELLI theorem is FALSE and there are not convergences to the Distribution Function
OR
___YOU NEVER USE STATISTICAL TABLES TO FIND OUT THE CRITICAL VALUES (and acceptance region) OF THE SAMPLE STATISTICS.

NO WAY OFF, JACK!!!

______licas (Luis A. Afonso)

Afonso... Please examine your Basic code. I believe there's an error
in it. OMU

.



Relevant Pages

  • Jack Tomsky: NO WAY OFF
    ... YOU PROVE THAT THE GLIVENKO-CANTELLI theorem is FALSE and there are not convergences to the Distribution Function ... ___YOU NEVER USE STATISTICAL TABLES TO FIND OUT THE CRITICAL VALUES OF THE SAMPLE STATISTICS. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Afonsos little tantrum...
    ... Statistics (Glivenko-Cantelli theorem, Strong theorem ... Distribution Function F. ... Function of the sample statistics. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Jack Tomsky: NO WAY OFF
    ... YOU PROVE THAT THE GLIVENKO-CANTELLI theorem is FALSE ... and there are not convergences to the Distribution ... STATISTICS. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: THIS IS *SPECIALLY* directed to OMU and Jack Tomsky
    ... Monte Carlo does or doesn’t be able to obtain whatever Distribution Function of an r.v. ... X (= sample statistics) is if the samples can be simulated? ... IS YOU JACK TOMSKY THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH STATISTICAL REASONING. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: weighted sum of bernoulli random variables
    ... >>distribution function, density, or probabilities? ... >>or moment generating functions. ... infinity with positive probability. ... There is no statistics involved; ...
    (sci.stat.math)