Re: Simple binomial test question
- From: Jack Tomsky <jtomsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:51:36 EDT
How authoritative is the opinion of a person – Jack
Tomsky - that finally confessed/admitted explicitly
(after my insistence) that he never heard or meet the
*Fundamental Theorem of Statistics*
(Glivenko-Cantelli) before?
Why could we believe in what is saying?
How to classify his learning and actual expertise
nowadays after decades of life?
The Readers are invited to answer.
_______licas (Luis A. Afonso)
Thanks for inviting me to respond. Even though I didn't know the G-C Theorem, I still understood it so much better than you that I was able to correct your misstatement of it.
http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?
JackmessageID=5611521&tstart=0
Jack
.
- References:
- Re: Simple binomial test question
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- Re: Simple binomial test question
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple binomial test question
- Next by Date: Re: scaling factor for convolution of gaussians
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple binomial test question
- Next by thread: Re: Simple binomial test question
- Index(es):