Re: Why Do Researchers Tell Lies About Smoking and Health?
- From: Ray Johnstone <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:06:59 +0800
On Sun, 27 May 2007 13:34:26 +0800, Ray Johnstone <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Correction, my mistake:
for cancerNah, that can't be the whole story. Too many scientists areI think it would come from a more rational approach to the question of
happy to admit odd findings if they promise new research
opportunities. And everyone is looking for miracle cures.
But in this case, Where is the viable research?
smoking and health. In Australia the age-adjusted death rate
has not
improved for 80 years. (I would expect a similar result for the US but
I don't recall ever seeing the numbers.)
Two thirds of the reports from the Surgeon General are about smoking
and health. I think there has been a lot of misguided and misdirected
effort.
Boffetta et al (1998): http://members.iinet.net.au/~ray/WHO1.mht
Brownson et al (1992): http://members.iinet.net.au/~ray/b.html
Van Duijn and Hofman (1991): BMJ, 302, 1491-1494
ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx
www.iinet.com.au/~ray
ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx
www.iinet.com.au/~ray
.
- References:
- Re: Why Do Researchers Tell Lies About Smoking and Health?
- From: Richard Ulrich
- Re: Why Do Researchers Tell Lies About Smoking and Health?
- From: Ray Johnstone
- Re: Why Do Researchers Tell Lies About Smoking and Health?
- Prev by Date: Re: SEE WHAT SOLUTION MANUALS ARE AVAILABLE!!!
- Next by Date: test for independence: P(C and D) = P(C)P(D) sufficient?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Do Researchers Tell Lies About Smoking and Health?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Do Researchers Tell Lies About Smoking and Health?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|