Re: Monte Carlo NEWS – 1971. JASA

David Winsemius

Read, please the last Tomsky post in this thread.
It´s a pity, but all your diligent action did result
any effect.
Could you repeat all you said in Tomsky´s behalf?
TEACHING HIM that
____we accept H0, consequently one are unable to
reject it?



This is Afonso's brilliant logic. If you accept Ho, it means that you should reject it.

"Tomsky finally agreed my from the start point of view, that fail to reject H0 simply means that there is sufficient evidence we should reject it"

Jack



____or we reject H0 only if there is sufficient
evidence, that the test statistics has a value that
is no conformable with a random variation supposing
H0 true?

JACK TOMSKY went back, his ancient belief reappeared.
IT`S AN OSCILATORY MADNESS HE SHOWS, ABSOLUTE
INABILITY TO DRAW DECISIONS.

__________
Luis
.