Re: APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED

*** Date: Aug 6, 2007 1:41 PM
Author: AWinestein@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED

On Aug 6, 3:23 am, "Luis A. Afonso" <lic...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED>> I invite everyone to ask for a MODERATION TEAM to check the answers in order Sci. Stat. Math. usefulness and quality be improved> ______________ Luis

Old Mac User got it right. Additionally, if you want
to propose a separate moderated news group that's fine with me, but be careful what you wish for because posts like those you usually make will never get past an even
marginally competent moderator.***


MY RESPONSE

OK… If you are fully confident (you are not) on your expertise YOU WOULD SUPPORT ME *** EXPLICITLY *** IN MY REQUEST to provide this NEWS with a referee team. GO HAED.
IF YOU DOES STAY QUIET, IF YOU PREFER IT REMAINS A PLAYGROUND OF SEMI_LEARNED BIOLOGISTS AND PSICOLOGISTS I HAVE ALL THE RIGT TO CLASSIFY YOU AS *** USHAMLESS HYPOCRITES***

THE TEAM SHOULD BE FORMED NOT BY MERELY ***USERS ON STATISTICS *** BUT BY *** TRUE STATISTICIANS***. If so all of us, READERS, will have the opportunity to test ours expertises.

NEVER, WE WILL FIND HERE UNLEARNED PERSONS THAT, FOR EXAMPLE, MET *** BY THE FIRST TIME *** RESULTS AS ELEMENTARY (AND FULL OF CONSEQUENCES), AS DVORETSKY – KIEFER – WOLFOWITZ, LILLIEFORS´S AND CLOPPER-PEARSON ARE.
Furtehermore
WE HARDLY FIND IN THIS PLACE PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT YEY SUFFICIENTLY PERSUADED THAT HYPOTHESES TESTS WERE NOT INVENTED TO PROVE H0 TRUE (OR EVEN Ha)

HOW HAPPY I WAS IF THIS WAS NOT A UNMODERATED NEWS!!!!!!!!
_______________
Luis
.