Re: APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED

What you say has any scientific value: you judgment hardly can be validated. But my example, concrete, easily verifiable I was exact, is the proof that Jack Tomsky is not even a mediocre statistician. He shows a degree of ignorance that is only similar to his self- indulgence and the stupidity of his *entourage*.
To *adjudication on al Statistical matters* from you there is but a joke. Who are you to grant to Jack so?
_______________
Luis


*** Date: Aug 6, 2007 9:49 PM
Author: randovaro


My classification of Jack as an expert statistician reveals precisely
nothing about me except that I am a sound judge of character. If my nomination is seconded the motion is carried and henceforth you must defer to Jack's adjudication on all matters Statistical.***
.