Re: APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED
- From: "Dave (from the UK)" <see-my-signature@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:31:37 +0100
Luis A. Afonso wrote:
APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED
I invite everyone to ask for a MODERATION TEAM to check the answers in order Sci. Stat. Math. usefulness and quality be improved
______________
Luis
Are you suggesting making the NG moderated? As far as I know, it is not possible to get unmoderated -> moderated, but the other way is possible.
I personaly think moderated newsgroups are a bad thing. I find the Mathematica one very annoying
a) Things take a while to get posted.
b) The moderator is rather biased in favor of Mathematica, so critisms tend to go to /dev/null.
I'm not convinced moderation achieves much useful myself.
--
Dave (from the UK)
Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam.
It is always of the form: month-year@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hitting reply will work for a few months only - later set it manually.
http://chessdb.sourceforge.net/ - a Free open-source Chess Database
.
- References:
- APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED
- Prev by Date: Jack Tomsky IS NOT A BIOLOGIST !!!
- Next by Date: Re: anova and chi-square test
- Previous by thread: Re: APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED
- Next by thread: Re: APPEAL: Sci. Stat. Math. MODERATED
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|