Is having an equal number of replications an advantage? (Question on Lack of Fit test in Simple Linear Regression)
- From: isabellesup@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:19:44 -0700
Dear Forum,
Sorry for reposting this.
The lack of fit test (for simple linear regression) tests the
following hypotheses:
Ho:E{Y}=beta0+beta1*X
Ha:E{Y} not equal to beta0+beta1*X
Basically, the test works as follows:
1/Write a "full" model Y_ij=mu_j+eps_ij
compute SSE(Full)=Sum(i,Sum(j,{Y_ij-Ybarj}^2))
2/Write a "reduced" model Y_ij=beta0+beta1*Xj+eps_ij
compute SSE(Reduced)=Sum(i,Sum(j,{Y_ij-beta0+beta1*Xj}^2))
3/Set up a F test that compares SSE(Full) with SSE(Reduced)
This test requires repeat observations at one or more X levels.
I am trying to answer the following question:
Is there any advantage in having an equal number of replications
at each of the X levels? Is there any disadvantage?
At this point, I cannot find a reason why an equal number of
replications would be an advantage.
Many thanks for your input.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: multivariate Gaussian
- Next by Date: Re: Linear Regression question. Is this a Berkson Model situation?
- Previous by thread: multivariate Gaussian
- Next by thread: Re: Is having an equal number of replications an advantage? (Question on Lack of Fit test in Simple Linear Regression)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|