WHO STOPS HIM?

WHO STOPS HIM?



I’m referring to the my values, obtained from the program JB:


Table A

Significance level
_SIZE_________5%___________1%______
__10______2.54__2.53_____5.72___5.70__
__15______3.30__3.29_____8.26___8.18__
__20______3.81__3.79_____9.73___9.66__
__25______4.16__4.16____10.78__10.74__
__30______4.40__4.41____11.33__11.27__
__35______4.57__4.59____11.67__11.80__
__40______4.74__4.77____11.95__12.01__
__45______4.86__4.88____12.29__12.19__
__50______4.95__4.95____12.36__12.46__


Can be compared with those in the
Thorsten Thadewald, Herbert Bunning
Jarque-Bera Test and its Competitors for Testing Normality
- A Power Comparison (March 2004)
(ISBN 3-935058- 78-0)

Table 5 (Excert)

__10____2.535___________5.738__
__20____3.768___________9.458__
__50____5.004__________12.331__
_100 ___ 5.448__________12.296__

Referring to Table A

Date: Dec 10, 2007 10:06 AM
Author: John Smith
Subject: Re: NOT BEFORE

Luis,

I don't want your code. I can't run it. I don't have basic. I don't anyone who does. What I want is an explanation: I asked about the 1% critical values. Your 1% simulation results are non-monotonic, and that your critical value for 1% when n=50 (12.46) is greater than the asymptotic value (9.21). Explain this! The only answer is that your code is wrong. Notice that NONE of Lawford's results are non-monotonic in that region. Therefore, your claim that your code agrees with Lawford's results is wrong! John
I highlight:
*** The only answer is that your code is wrong***
*** Therefore, your claim that your code agrees wih Lawford´s IS WRONG!***


My response

It is really urgent that a REFEREES TEAM must check posts from pseudo-statisticians. (for example John Smith).

____
Luis Amaral Afonso
.

Relevant Pages