Re: The Logic of Hypotheses Tests
- From: Jack Tomsky <jtomsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:28:09 EST
I made “thousands “ of Hypotheses Tests in my entire
life and not even one time I made confusion (surely
because I use the version CRITICAL VALUES): therefore
the concept NOT ACCEPT – FAILED TO ACCEPT is
absolutely clear in my mind.
And so clear that, when I passed to the, not usual,
version p(data| H0) I didn’t realize that the
condition leading to FAIL TO REJECT (NOT SAY TO
ACCEPT!!!) is, in fact,
____________ ALPHA > 1 – p(data| H0)
My humble apology. Conclusion and advertising: use
preferentially the concept of critical values!
Luis Amaral Afonso
In Afonso 2.0, the decision rule is now
do not accept H0 at the ALPHA significance level (usually 5% or 1%) only if:
_____p(data | H0) < ALPHA
and FAIL TO REJECT (NOT SAY TO
ACCEPT!!!) if:
____________ p(data | H0) > 1 - ALPHA.
Thus, when
ALPHA <= p(data | H0) <= 1 - ALPHA,
the decision rule is undefined.
Because of these poor characteristics, I recommend that neither Afonso 2.0 nor Afonso 1.0 be used in hypothesis testing as replacements for Neyman-Pearson.
Jack (moderator)
.
- References:
- Re: The Logic of Hypotheses Tests
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- Re: The Logic of Hypotheses Tests
- Prev by Date: degenerate bivariate normal (X,X)
- Next by Date: Jack Tomsky is unable to interpret Test Hypotheses RESULTS
- Previous by thread: Re: The Logic of Hypotheses Tests
- Next by thread: Laser Hair Removal: 5 Main Factors
- Index(es):