Re: Clustering categorical data
- From: John Uebersax <jsuebersax@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:11:20 -0800 (PST)
Hi Jiana,
You say "categorical" data, but you also mention "5-point scales",
which suggests that you have ordered-categorical or else Likert-type
data, and probably the latter.
In this case my personal suggestion would be to treat the data as
interval-level measurement, and to perform some form of ordinary
cluster analysis, like k-means or hierarchical clustering.
The case for treating the data as interval-level is made stronger if
your "scales" are (1) internally symmetrical in wording, and (2)
accompanied by a visual analog scale with equally-spaced intervals.
So there is no confusion, your case is a little unusual in that your
objects/cases here are "items", which are measured on
"characteristics." Though you are clustering items, this is not a
cluster analysis of variables, but of objects. The possible confusion
develops because one may cluster either cases or variables, and the
latter is sometimes called "item cluster analysis." Here you are
clustering items, but it is a standard "object cluster analysis."
Hope this helps.
John Uebersax PhD
ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax
On Feb 15, 11:25 pm, jiana <cannon.jan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm desparately trying to find a procedure to cluster categorical
data. I have 100 items, each rated on 12 characteristics. The
responses were collected on 5 point catagorical specific scales and
want to assemble the items into groups. Can you help? Any
suggestions?
.
- References:
- Clustering categorical data
- From: jiana
- Clustering categorical data
- Prev by Date: Re: Jack Tomsky is unable to interpret Test Hypotheses RESULTS
- Next by Date: Distribution entropy and units
- Previous by thread: Re: Clustering categorical data
- Next by thread: How many components are good?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|