Re: Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- From: "danheyman@xxxxxxxxx" <danheyman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 12, 3:45 am, Michael Haenlein <haenl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 12, 4:29 am, "danhey...@xxxxxxxxx" <danhey...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 11, 3:39 pm, Michael Haenlein <haenl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear all,
I have three questions regarding summing up gamma distributed random
variables:
(1) Is there a closed-form expression for the sum of two gamma random
variables that have the same scale parameter but different shape
parameters? Essentially, what's the sum of a gamma (p,v) random
variable and a gamma (q,v) random variable (p being the shape
parameter and v the scale parameter)?
(2) I think to remember that the sum of n i.i.d. gamma (p, í) random
variables is itself distributed gamma with shape parameter pn and
scale parameter í. Is this correct?
(3) Another think I have in mind is that a gamma (p, í) random
variable multiplied by the scalar 1/x is itself distributed gamma with
shape parameter p and scale parameter íx. Again, is this correct?
Thanks very much for your help in advance,
Michael
(0) I assume you meant to state that the random variables are
independent; I'm making that assumption.
(1) There is a known closed-form. It can be found in the book of
distributions of Johnson and Kotz that contains the gamma dst. The
scale parameters can be different as well. A way to derive the result
is to multiply the Laplace transforms, expand the product by partial
fractions and invert by inspection. The details are intricate; I did
it with Macsyma (sp?). Maple or Mathematica are alternatives.
(2) Yes.
(3) Yes- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Thanks very much for your answer!
Am I right in assuming that you are referring to the book titled
"Continuous univariate distributions" written by Norman L. Johnson,
Samuel Kotz and N. Balakrishnan?
I have another question in the same spirit, namely the sum of two
gammas where the shape parameters are different and the scale
parameters differ by a fixed factor. So essentially: gamma (p,v) +
gamma (q,vx) = ???. But I assume your logic works the same for this
case?
Again, thanks very much for your help?
Michael
I think that's the book I meant. It's been several years since I
looked this up, and I don't have access to a technical library now.
Yes, the logic works for that case. The scale parameters can be any
INTEGERS (I forgot to emphase that before). I don't know of partial
fraction expansions for non-integer powers.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- From: Michael Haenlein
- Re: Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- References:
- Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- From: Michael Haenlein
- Re: Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- From: danheyman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- From: Michael Haenlein
- Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- Prev by Date: Re: Experiment with repeated measures
- Next by Date: smart way to invert a covariance matrix?
- Previous by thread: Re: Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- Next by thread: Re: Sum of gamma distributed random variables
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|