Re: The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- From: "Luis A. Afonso" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:46:53 EDT
Since the Hyper Stupid Jack Tomsky states that is able to ACCEPT THE NULL HYPOTHESES,
I´am asking
***********how many flips HE needs to perform TO CONCLUDE A COIN IS FAIR.*************************************
This is the simplest Test Statistics even invented.
Luis Amaral Afonso ( The Moderator´s Destroyer)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- From: John Smith
- Re: The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- References:
- The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- Prev by Date: Re: question on binomial random variables
- Next by Date: Re: Adjust for Skewness and Kurtosis in Excel
- Previous by thread: Re: The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- Next by thread: Re: The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
