Re: Adumbo still can't answer simple question



On May 27, 9:33 pm, John Smith <jsmith_...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Mr Weaver,

And by the way, if you want anyone to believe this
"concern for
newbies" shtick, you ought to post occasional
responses to newbie
questions.  As far as I can tell, all of your posts
are (inflammatory)
responses to Afonso.

If I were to answer a newbie question thread that had not already been polluted by Adumbostistics, many might see my name on that thread and conclude that it already was polluted by Adumbostistics.  Hence, in such situations I offer nothing.

In those cases where Adumbo has polluted the thread with his version of "statistics", it is invariably the case that someone else already has answered the newbie's question.  

If you are really interested in helping the newbies then you should
start off by pointing out to them everything that is wrong with
confidence intervals and related codswallop. I suggest you read:

Jaynes, E. T., 1976. `Confidence Intervals vs Bayesian Intervals,' in
Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and
Statistical Theories of Science, W. L. Harper and C. A. Hooker (eds.),
D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 175.

You can find the pdf here (but beware, it is an 8MB file):

http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/articles/confidence.pdf

It is not difficult to read, but it shows why the rag-bag of tricks
that constitutes orthodox statistics should be thrown out of the
window. Particularly instructive are the schlerotic remarks made by
various eminent statisticians in the discussion at the end. They
cannot bring themselves to admit that they could not think clearly or
critically enough to see through the mumbo-jumbo they were fed as
students.

illywhacker;
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Concantenation and string slicing
    ... I sometimes get the feeling a lot of responses to newbies, lately, ... fail to explain what was wrong in the original code in favor of showing ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Accepting Afonsos Invitation
    ... I don't want newbies who come to this list  looking for 'statistics' to confuse statistics with adumbostistics. ... typical newbies don't look at threads they don't initiate. ... they immediately post a question. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Time to shut down this list?
    ... >>the people asking the questions are really newbies. ... detailed responses on -questions, and I've monitored the -newbies list. ... at "Web pages " type boot. ... FreeBSD handbook on line to be an even better source; ...
    (freebsd-newbies)
  • Re: OT: In defence of ``newbie-picking (was:Re: MS Project 2003)
    ... > We can use whatever excuse we want, but I've found that the way clueless ... > newbies are treated on this list is just plain rotten. ... but it seems to many are in a hurry to shout RTFMA and excuse ... the responses you get are either ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Youtube:New Videos
    ... If any of you oldbies and newbies want to check out my Youtube ... I think you will find it exciting.The responses have been ...
    (rec.music.opera)