sci.stat.math

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Relationship between Pearson rho and Kendall tau
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Relationship between Pearson rho and Kendall tau
  • From: Schizoid Man
• Re: Nonparametric covariance equality test
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: software for "multilevel programming"?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Calculating source-effect means from a non-sig response variable from two source-effects ?
  • From: Yabahoobs
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Scott Hemphill
• Re: software for "multilevel programming"?
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Regression
  • From: RichUlrich
• software for "multilevel programming"?
  • From: isabellesup
• Nonparametric covariance equality test
  • From: Edward Jensen
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• A * Titans * fight: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Measuring the quality of hypotheses?
  • From: Scott Seidman
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Regression
  • From: Richard Startz
• Re: Regression
  • From: RichUlrich
• Fisher said: the null hypotheses is never proved or established
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Accept the Null Hypothesis
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accept the Null Hypothesis
  • From: JoJo
• Re: Accept the Null Hypothesis
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Accept the Null Hypothesis
  • From: Barry W Brown
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: only significant with interaction
  • From: mcap
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Lead poisoning?
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Lead poisoning?
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Afonso incompetent.
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Le pire, c'est que ce n'est pas fini !
  • From: Riku Westerholm
• Re: Watch Afonso refuse to accept this hypothesis!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Measuring the quality of hypotheses?
  • From: Gary
• Re: Measuring the quality of hypotheses?
  • From: Gary
• Re: Watch Afonso refuse to accept this hypothesis!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Watch Afonso refuse to accept this hypothesis!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Watch Afonso refuse to accept this hypothesis!
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Regression
  • From: lw
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Linear Regressions before and after rotating about y=x
  • From: Gaj Vidmar
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Linear Regressions before and after rotating about y=x
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Linear Regressions before and after rotating about y=x
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Who put Jack Tomsky in jail?
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Who put Jack Tomsky in jail?
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Linear Regressions before and after rotating about y=x
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Linear Regressions before and after rotating about y=x
  • From: will dudziak
• Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• 2414 Solutions manuals
  • From: BERGH
• Sum of two dependent random variables
  • From: Akhil
• Re: AFTER ALL, Jack Tomsky, one of the ignorants was R.A. Fisher !!!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: only significant with interaction
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Equal or Unequal Variances?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: isabellesup
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Horseman
• Re: AFTER ALL, Jack Tomsky, one of the ignorants was R.A. Fisher !!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Equal or Unequal Variances?
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: only significant with interaction
  • From: Ray Koopman
• only significant with interaction
  • From: mcap
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: dave
• Re: Regression
  • From: RichUlrich
• Re: AFTER ALL, Jack Tomsky, one of the ignorants was R.A. Fisher !!!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: AFTER ALL, Jack Tomsky, one of the ignorants was R.A. Fisher !!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Funciones de Densidad de Probabilidad generadas por Métodos Contractivos. T
  • From: mantrax
• Re: Tetrachoric correlation: Is this formula still used?
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Tetrachoric correlation: Is this formula still used?
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Regression
  • From: Richard Startz
• Re: Regression
  • From: Richard Startz
• Re: Regression
  • From: lw
• Re: Equal or Unequal Variances?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Regression
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Regression
  • From: Richard Startz
• Re: Regression
  • From: lw
• Re: Tetrachoric correlation: Is this formula still used?
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Uncorrelatedness implies independence (under what situation)
  • From: Herman Rubin
• off-topic language discussion
  • From: bokdan hermicz
• Re: Measuring the quality of hypotheses?
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: AFTER ALL, Jack Tomsky, one of the ignorants was R.A. Fisher !!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: dave
• Equal or Unequal Variances?
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: AFTER ALL, Jack Tomsky, one of the ignorants was R.A. Fisher !!!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• AFTER ALL, Jack Tomsky, one of the ignorants was R.A. Fisher !!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: No experiment can distinguish between the case of no difference between
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Tetrachoric correlation: Is this formula still used?
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Scott Hemphill
• Re: interaction of two normalized distributions
  • From: RichUlrich
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: kunzmilan
• Tetrachoric correlation: Is this formula still used?
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: dave
• How to calculate Chi Square P value when using Crystal Ball distribution fitting?
  • From: Gaetan
• analyzing sequences of 0s and 1s
  • From: isabellesup
• Re: Uncorrelatedness implies independence (under what situation)
  • From: sangdonlee
• Re: Measuring the quality of hypotheses?
  • From: Lou Pecora
• Factor Analysis on Factors
  • From: charles19
• Regression
  • From: sagar
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Allen McIntosh
• Re: Uncorrelatedness implies independence (under what situation)
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Uncorrelatedness implies independence (under what situation)
  • From: karl
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Horseman
• Re: Uncorrelatedness implies independence (under what situation)
  • From: istillshine
• Uncorrelatedness implies independence (under what situation)
  • From: istillshine
• interaction of two normalized distributions
  • From: zikester
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Scott Hemphill
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: The product of Gaussian process and Poisson process
  • From: luolg05
• Re: The product of Gaussian process and Poisson process
  • From: luolg05
• Re: The product of Gaussian process and Poisson process
  • From: David Jones
• The product of Gaussian process and Poisson process
  • From: luolg05
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Measuring the quality of hypotheses?
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Measuring the quality of hypotheses?
  • From: Scott Seidman
• Measuring the quality of hypotheses?
  • From: Gary
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: bokdan hermicz
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Horseman
• Re: CRIMCOORD transformation in QUEST
  • From: shiun
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Horseman
• Re: Tricky probability question. HELP!
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Tricky probability question. HELP!
  • From: west4961
• Re: Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Estimated means & SDs for tetrachoric (or polychoric) correlation matrix
  • From: RichUlrich
• Re: Confidence on the maximum of some measure
  • From: RichUlrich
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Marketing Effectiveness
  • From: dave
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Estimated means & SDs for tetrachoric (or polychoric) correlation matrix
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: No experiment can distinguish between the case of no difference between
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Estimated means & SDs for tetrachoric (or polychoric) correlation matrix
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Estimated means & SDs for tetrachoric (or polychoric) correlation matrix
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Histogram Bucket Size
  • From: Art Kendall
• Re: Estimated means & SDs for tetrachoric (or polychoric) correlation matrix
  • From: Art Kendall
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Tricky probability question. HELP!
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Histogram Bucket Size
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Histogram Bucket Size
  • From: Russell
• Estimated means & SDs for tetrachoric (or polychoric) correlation matrix
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Tricky probability question. HELP!
  • From: ajbarkeruk
• Marketing Effectiveness
  • From: PK
• Re: Discrete and Continue RVs
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: E(z) in range of standard normal distribution
  • From: Ray Koopman
• E(z) in range of standard normal distribution
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Discrete and Continue RVs
  • From: France
• Re: No experiment can distinguish between the case of no difference between
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Some help with a ballast math question?
  • From: Horseman
• Re: No experiment can distinguish between the case of no difference between
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Discrete and Continue RVs
  • From: Aniko
• Histogram Bucket Size
  • From: sam . espinosa
• Discrete and Continue RVs
  • From: France
• Re: Sampling?
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: STUPIDITY, PREJUDICE AND CONCERN OF ETHICS ABSENCE
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: STUPIDITY, PREJUDICE AND CONCERN OF ETHICS ABSENCE
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: STUPIDITY, PREJUDICE AND CONCERN OF ETHICS ABSENCE
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Sampling?
  • From: JDK
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Luis Amaral Afonso Still Wrong
  • From: John Smith
• Re: the type II error has not nothing to do with *** accepting H0 ***
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Luis Amaral Afonso Still Wrong
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• the type II error has not nothing to do with *** accepting H0 ***
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: STUPIDITY, PREJUDICE AND CONCERN OF ETHICS ABSENCE
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: STUPIDITY, PREJUDICE AND CONCERN OF ETHICS ABSENCE
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: STUPIDITY, PREJUDICE AND CONCERN OF ETHICS ABSENCE
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: STUPIDITY, PREJUDICE AND CONCERN OF ETHICS ABSENCE
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Not significant difference doesn’t means H0 ACCEPTANCE
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Not significant difference doesn’t means H0 ACCEPTANCE
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: STUPIDITY, PREJUDICE AND CONCERN OF ETHICS ABSENCE
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Atlantis jatkuu
  • From: Yrjö Laaksonen
• Re: Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Sensitivity Analysis in Propensity Score Matching
  • From: Ben
• Re: Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
  • From: Adam Baker
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: S. F. Thomas
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: aruzinsky
• Adumbo admits own formula is wrong!
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: dave
• Can I define infinite-dimensional Gaussian distribution?
  • From: istillshine
• Re: Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
  • From: Adam Baker
• Re: Why the Null Hypothesis is Not Accepted
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Use of G Statistics equation for comparing sample distribution.
  • From: Aniko
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Scott Hemphill
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: aruzinsky
• Re: Use of G Statistics equation for comparing sample distribution.
  • From: crd319
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: dave
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
  • From: Adam Baker
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Confidence on the maximum of some measure
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Confidence on the maximum of some measure
  • From: mmcgarry.work@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: May Liszt
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Scott Hemphill
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Use of G Statistics equation for comparing sample distribution.
  • From: Aniko
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Random values from Hyberbolic Distribution on unit interval [0,1]
  • From: Nicholas Kinar
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Scott Hemphill
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: aruzinsky
• Re: Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Fitting normal distribution to a histogram
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Bayes' theorem for probability densities
  • From: Maurizio
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Aniko
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: significant difference of ratios
  • From: Gottfried Helms
• Re: significant difference of ratios
  • From: Ray Koopman
• significant difference of ratios
  • From: Gottfried Helms
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: aruzinsky
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: aruzinsky
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: richardstartz
• Re: nonlinear least squares
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Point of diminishing returns?
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: aruzinsky
• Re: Random values from Hyberbolic Distribution on unit interval [0,1]
  • From: Aniko
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Aniko
• Re: Point of diminishing returns?
  • From: jefftyzzer
• Re: Point of diminishing returns?
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Degrees of Freedom of Estimated Variance Components in Linear Models
  • From: May Liszt
• Point of diminishing returns?
  • From: jefftyzzer
• Re: properties of probability generating function
  • From: cliff
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: dave
• Random values from Hyberbolic Distribution on unit interval [0,1]
  • From: Nicholas Kinar
• Re: nonlinear least squares
  • From: Francogrex
• Use of G Statistics equation for comparing sample distribution.
  • From: crd319
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: richardstartz
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: properties of probability generating function
  • From: Inf
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: aruzinsky
• Re: properties of probability generating function
  • From: cliff
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Aniko
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Measuring dispersion
  • From: ssn
• Re: Simple Question about Sample size
  • From: Stan Devia
• Re: Measuring dispersion
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Measuring dispersion
  • From: ssn
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Measuring dispersion
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Measuring dispersion
  • From: illywhacker
• properties of probability generating function
  • From: Inf
• Re: averaging over subjects or trials for ANOVA
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Root Mean Squared Distance of Two Uneven Populations
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• averaging over subjects or trials for ANOVA
  • From: Bellochka
• Re: Root Mean Squared Distance of Two Uneven Populations
  • From: gundalav
• Re: Measuring dispersion
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Measuring dispersion
  • From: ssn
• Re: Very Important...Logistic Regression Simulation
  • From: Aniko
• Re: Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Missing values
  • From: Aniko
• Adding Regressors to ARIMA.
  • From: Robert
• nonrandom sampling
  • From: Philip A . Viton
• Very Important...Logistic Regression Simulation
  • From: A.A.A
• Re: The Formula for D
  • From: John Smith
• Re: nonlinear least squares
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Simple Question about Sample size
  • From: geetha.shree@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Root Mean Squared Distance of Two Uneven Populations
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Correlations between adjacent time series data points but not points over the whole sample
  • From: littlebear
• Re: nonlinear least squares
  • From: Art Kendall
• Re: Correlations between adjacent time series data points but not points over the whole sample
  • From: David Jones
• The Formula for D
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: illywhacker
• nonlinear least squares
  • From: Francogrex
• Root Mean Squared Distance of Two Uneven Populations
  • From: gundalav
• Re: Simple Question about Sample size
  • From: Stan Devia
• Simple Question about Sample size
  • From: geetha.shree@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: need help with one problem (sampling )
  • From: Ken Butler
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: aruzinsky
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Correlations between adjacent time series data points but not points over the whole sample
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Correlations between adjacent time series data points but not points over the whole sample
  • From: littlebear
• 400 solutions manual from GetSolution Team
  • From: getsolution team
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: John Smith
• Re: need help with one problem (sampling )
  • From: woodland
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: aruzinsky
• Re: Missing values
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: need help with one problem (sampling )
  • From: Ken Butler
• need help with one problem (sampling )
  • From: woodland
• Missing values
  • From: jquest
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: illywhacker
• Best Fit for Classification
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: lscharen
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Ray Koopman
• cubic spline
  • From: johnpitchard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ordinary Least Squares question
  • From: borislav.vangelov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ordinary Least Squares question
  • From: richardstartz
• Ordinary Least Squares question
  • From: borislav.vangelov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Estimation of individual-level lifetimes in survival analysis
  • From: Michael Haenlein
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: max(L)
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: richardstartz
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: x/1! + (1/2)*x^2/2! + (1/3)*x^3/3! + ... = ?
  • From: Aniko
• x/1! + (1/2)*x^2/2! + (1/3)*x^3/3! + ... = ?
  • From: Jong-Hoon Kim
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: lscharen
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: JoJo
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: JoJo
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: richardstartz
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Graham Ashe
• To Imbeciles symbols definitions are unimportant!!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Miscellaneous
  • From: Philip A . Viton
• Re: Miscellaneous
  • From: illywhacker
• Miscellaneous
  • From: sagar
• Re: Random Distribution of Two Types of Objects with Different Coordination Numbers
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Histograms using data with errors
  • From: malawk
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: max(L)
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: max(L)
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: richardstartz
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Random Distribution of Two Types of Objects with Different Coordination Numbers
  • From: Aniko
• Re: Bayes' theorem for probability densities
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: John Smith
• Re: probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Ken Butler
• probit analysis with natural response
  • From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• A lot of Solutions Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format
  • From: trustsolution@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: David L. Wilson
• Correlation Between Mean and Standard Deviation
  • From: Graham Ashe
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Probability of at Least n, with probability P, out of N
  • From: PeterOut
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Optimal Allocation Under Failure
  • From: ameba . spugnosa
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: John Smith
• time series modelling and forecasting
  • From: dave
• Automated Yates Matrix
  • From: besombes
• Re: Optimal Allocation Under Failure
  • From: Aniko
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• many Solutions Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format
  • From: trustsolution@xxxxxxxxxxx
• 2635 Solutions manuals
  • From: BERGH
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Optimal Allocation Under Failure
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Bayes' theorem for probability densities
  • From: JoJo
• Re: urn model
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: urn model
  • From: randerson1184
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: urn model
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: urn model
  • From: randerson1184
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: urn model
  • From: randerson1184
• Re: urn model
  • From: isabellesup
• Re: Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Random Distribution of Two Types of Objects with Different Coordination Numbers
  • From: ealass
• Re: number of replications
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Accepting Afonso's Invitation
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Luis Amaral Afonso Still Wrong
  • From: John Smith
• number of replications
  • From: A.A.A
• Re: Bayes' theorem for probability densities
  • From: se16
• Re: Luis Amaral Afonso Still Wrong
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Luis Amaral Afonso Still Wrong
  • From: John Smith
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Interpreting PCA Components Biplot
  • From: Paige Miller
• Bayes' theorem for probability densities
  • From: Maurizio
• Interpreting PCA Components Biplot
  • From: foolishbrat
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: urn model
  • From: randerson1184
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: John Smith
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: linear regression results approximates to the mean of Y
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: urn model
  • From: randerson1184
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: urn model
  • From: isabellesup
• Re: urn model
  • From: isabellesup
• Re: urn model
  • From: randerson1184
• Re: urn model
  • From: randerson1184
• Re: urn model
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: urn model
  • From: isabellesup
• Re: urn model
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Mahalanobis distance adaptive computation ?
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Adumbostistics Terminology: "coverage prob of U relative to event A"
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• urn model
  • From: isabellesup
• Optimal Allocation Under Failure
  • From: ameba . spugnosa
• Re: Mahalanobis distance adaptive computation ?
  • From: Graham Jones
• Re: t-test
  • From: miss_amy
• Mahalanobis distance adaptive computation ?
  • From: chariatisad
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Adumbostistics Terminology: "coverage prob of U relative to event A"
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: t-test
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: recommendations for good research areas
  • From: cprice
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: recommendations for good research areas
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• ”Mathematical Proofs” by G. Chartrand
  • From: tttt12396
• Re: recommendations for good research areas
  • From: Robert Dodier
• Afonso admits own formula is wrong!
  • From: John Smith
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: t-test
  • From: naught
• Re: t-test
  • From: miss_amy
• adumbocito still lies
  • From: John Smith
• Re: t-test
  • From: naught
• Re: t-test
  • From: miss_amy
• Re: t-test
  • From: miss_amy
• Re: t-test
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: t-test
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Adumbostistics in Action: samples can have confidence intervals
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Soln. Manual. Req.
  • From: ChEng
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: t-test
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Adumbostistics in Action: samples can have confidence intervals
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Afonso lies about his own posts!
  • From: John Smith
• Re: t-test
  • From: miss_amy
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Probability of at Least n, with probability P, out of N
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: t-test
  • From: Old Mac User
• t-test
  • From: miss_amy
• Re: Probability of at Least n, with probability P, out of N
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Probability of at Least n, with probability P, out of N
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Adumbostistics Terminology: "coverage prob of U relative to event A"
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Probability of at Least n, with probability P, out of N
  • From: PeterOut
• WORMSTOMSKY MAILING THE CANINE SUBSERVIENT
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• recommendations for good research areas
  • From: Faheem Mitha
• Re: Afonso's Algebra is Wrong
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Adumbostistics Terminology: "coverage prob of U relative to event A"
  • From: John Smith
• Afonso's Algebra is Wrong
  • From: John Smith
• Re: linear regression results approximates to the mean of Y
  • From: feilian
• Re: Mgf of Exponential distribution
  • From: thampw
• WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula! III
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Adumbostistics Terminology: "coverage prob of U relative to event A"
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Adumbostistics Terminology: "coverage prob of U relative to event A"
  • From: John Smith
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Math and the world around us - Bruce Sturman
  • From: Bruce D Sturman
• Re: Ordinal Regression
  • From: geetha.shree@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Histograms using data with errors
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Mgf of Exponential distribution
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Mgf of Exponential distribution
  • From: thampw
• SOME DO CLAIM NULL HYPOTHESES CAN BE STATED TRUE!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: What is power and size of hypothesis test?
  • From: richardstartz
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: Robert Dodier
• Re: What is power and size of hypothesis test?
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Bootstrapping & Structural Equation Modeling
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Creating random vectors whose data are correlated ?
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Linear disciminant analysis, dimensionality of data in each class< no: classes
  • From: Greg Heath
• Histograms using data with errors
  • From: malawk
• Re: linear regression results approximates to the mean of Y
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Logistic regression and linear regression
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Logistic regression and linear regression
  • From: Greg Heath
• Re: Bootstrapping & Structural Equation Modeling
  • From: John Uebersax
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture formula
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Afonso´s conjecture formula
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: none
• Bootstrapping & Structural Equation Modeling
  • From: Olivier Mairesse
• Re: Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: none
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: don wire
• Re: Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Harder probability problem
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: John Smith
• Harder probability problem
  • From: djauy2njj
• Re: Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: randerson1184
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Two types of dichotomous variables
  • From: petersson
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: don wire
• Adumbostistics: probabiliites can be > 1 !!!
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: Scott
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Waiting for a Tomsky´s derivation!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Waiting for a Tomsky´s derivation!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Jack Tomsky later Blunders
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: The danger of classical hypothesis and significance tests [was Re: MADLY AMUSED]
  • From: David Jones
• Re: The danger of classical hypothesis and significance tests [was Re: MADLY AMUSED]
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: The danger of classical hypothesis and significance tests [was Re: MADLY AMUSED]
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Two types of dichotomous variables
  • From: David Jones
• Re: Two types of dichotomous variables
  • From: Horand . Gassmann
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture II
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Jack Tomsky later Blunders
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture II
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Easy probability question
  • From: se16
• Two types of dichotomous variables
  • From: petersson
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Dr Tomsky did you notice?
  • From: John Smith
• Easy probability question
  • From: djauy2njj
• Re: Dr Tomsky did you notice?
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Dr Tomsky did you notice?
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Adumbostistics: more Schroedinger's Cat
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Adumbostistics: more Schroedinger's Cat
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: A linear transformation KNOCKED-OUT Jack Tomsky!!!
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Levy process questions
  • From: thampw
• A linear transformation KNOCKED-OUT Jack Tomsky!!!
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture II
  • From: Old Mac User
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: Scott
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Richard Ulrich
• Re: Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Estimating lambda in exponential dist
  • From: Scott
• Re: The danger of classical hypothesis and significance tests [was Re: MADLY AMUSED]
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: The danger of classical hypothesis and significance tests [was Re: MADLY AMUSED]
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Probability of making a choice by a person, on the basis of earlier made choices?
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: On the generalized distance in statistics
  • From: statman
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Adumbostistics: more Schroedinger's Cat
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Adumbostistics: more Schroedinger's Cat
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Adumbostistics: more Schroedinger's Cat
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Adumbostistics: more Schroedinger's Cat
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Adumbostistics: more Schroedinger's Cat
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture II
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Afonso´s conjecture II
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Adumbostistics: more Schroedinger's Cat
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Deprived
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Deprived
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Deprived
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Afonso´s algorithm
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: logistic regression constant
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Levy process questions
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Afonso´s algorithm
  • From: John Smith
• logistic regression constant
  • From: Kea
• Re: The danger of classical hypothesis and significance tests [was Re: MADLY AMUSED]
  • From: S. F. Thomas
• Re: Deprived
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Afonso´s conjecture
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: The danger of classical hypothesis and significance tests [was Re: MADLY AMUSED]
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Deprived
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Probability of making a choice by a person, on the basis of earlier made choices?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: ordinal logistic regression or other classifcation techniques: weaknesses
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Polytomous logistic regression
  • From: Bruce Weaver
• Re: Probability of making a choice by a person, on the basis of earlier made choices?
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: The danger of classical hypothesis and significance tests [was Re: MADLY AMUSED]
  • From: illywhacker
• Re: Deprived
  • From: Luis A. Afonso
• Re: Polytomous logistic regression
  • From: Pratim Vakish
• ordinal logistic regression or other classifcation techniques: weaknesses
  • From: Pratim Vakish
• Re: Outlayers
  • From: Russell
• THIS algorithm you stupid Adumbo!
  • From: John Smith
• Re: Deprived
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Deprived
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Deprived
  • From: Jack Tomsky
• Re: Deprived
  • From: licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Deprived
  • From: John Smith

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(14)