Re: WORMTOMSKY is unable to derive a self-invented formula!

On 6 Jun, 18:54, Jack Tomsky <jtom...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
FACTS ARE FACTS

_________[ obsv - 0.0196, obsv + 0.0196]
covers the DAM parameter 0.95 of times, but
_____p(DAM<1E-16) = 0.79788E-16

Since DAM is a parameter, it is a constant and has
no probability.

Jack (moderator)



THEREFORE IT IS PROVED THAT **********
******* DAM=0 is, extremely, absurdly,
astronomically, WORMTOMSKLY unlike to be found in
the
interval [0 -1E-16, 0 + 1E-16] *****
THEREFORE ONE CANNOT, NEVER EVER, STATE THAT THE
NULL
HYPOTHESES CAN BE PROVED TRUE.
THIS IS THE REASON THAT, TRUE STATISTICIANS
PREFER TO
SAY (IF SO)
____One fails to reject the null Hypotheses

The conclusion is ONLY THIS!

(A thought: Poor Mrs. Tomsky, her husband seems
unable to go whatever till the end!).

Luis Amaral Afonso (The moderator destroyer)-
Ocultar texto citado -

- Mostrar texto citado -

Luis said

RIDICULOUS. A parameter should be ESTIMATE IN ODER
THAT
ONE KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT ITS VALUE.: PONTUAL
ESTIMATION OR BY INTERVAL
Luis Amaral Afonso [THe moderator destroyer]




Luis Amaral Afonso is criticizing Afonso's assumption that DAM is known to be zero and is not merely an estimate.

Jack (moderator)
.

Relevant Pages