Re: Why the Null Hypothesis is Not Accepted
- From: Jack Tomsky <jtomsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:01:38 EDT
This is from The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume II, by Maurice G. Kendall, page 270.
"In fact, we shall seek for the test which, while obeying (26.1), minimizes the risk of accepting Ho when an alternative hypothesis H1 is true and Ho according is false."
What's the matter with M.G. Kendall? What is this business with accepting Ho? I doubt that Kendall ever took a statistics class from Professor Afonso.
Jack (moderator)
.
- References:
- The Formula for D
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- The Formula for D
- Prev by Date: Re: Use of G Statistics equation for comparing sample distribution.
- Next by Date: Re: Regression in which dependent variable has a strict boundary
- Previous by thread: Re: The Formula for D
- Next by thread: Not significant difference doesn’t means H0 ACCEPTANCE
- Index(es):