Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
- From: Jack Tomsky <jtomsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:29:53 EDT
The dirty trick Jack Tomsky uses in switching to his
bibliography has the clear goal to lead more and more
away from the central problem under discussion: Is it
correct to state that one accept the Null
Hypotheses?
One can ask us in what extent his expertise really
is, but one cannot have any doubt at all that Jack
Tomsky is the most despicable person even born in
what concerns his fairness. He is the most complete
cheater I was met in all my life.
Luis Amaral Afonso [The moderator destroyer]
For several years now, I have been trying to tell Afonso that it is permissible to accept the null hypothesis even if the type II error is positive. I even recently quoted nine links from the Internet, but nothing seems to penetrate.
Jack (moderator)
.
- References:
- Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
- Prev by Date: Re: Linear Regressions before and after rotating about y=x
- Next by Date: Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
- Previous by thread: Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
- Next by thread: Re: See (WEB) Accepting the Null Hypotheses
- Index(es):