Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- From: Jack Tomsky <jtomsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:35:10 EDT
To the stage they turned up, unexpectedly, two odd
players: the type I and the type II errors.
For the tricky, indecent and unethical Jack Tomsky
even the use of a clear * petition principle *
doesn’t stop him: THE ERRORS EXISTENCE ARE DEFINED IF
H0 is true (Type I), or Ha is true (Type II). THEY
ARE WORTHLESS TO THE DISCUSSION WE ARE HAVING HERE.
It is a clear circular thought (However, clearly,
they are very useful to keep the confusion alive; the
Jacks goal to try to erase his BRUNDLE).
Luis Amaral Afonso [The moderator destroyer]
.
Since Afonso doesn't understand type I and type II errors within the Neyman-Pearson framework of hypothesis testing, he considers it unfair for anyone to mention them and add to his confusion.
Jack (moderator)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- From: John Smith
- Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- References:
- Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- Prev by Date: Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- Next by Date: Stat Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- Next by thread: Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|