Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- From: Jack Tomsky <jtomsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:40:55 EDT
*********
Two sample parameters comparison (observed p1^ and
p2^)___H0: p1 = p2 ___H1: p1=/ p2.
Let be W (data| H0) a complete, unbiased, known
statistics, of the continuous parameter p. The
confidence interval for the difference D= |p1-p2| is
__|p1^ - p2^| - W(1-a) <= D <= |p1^ - p2^| - W(a)
when the difference |p1-p2| of the two parameters. By
a= alpha is noted the significance level.
Because the above C. I. doesn’t degenerate in a
single point, consequently W(a) = W(1-a), ONE CAN
NEVER BE SURE OF THE TWO PARAMETER´S EQUALITY, say
D=0.
Furthermore, for significative tests, the absolute
difference on parameters (at alpha significance
level) must be greater than D.
Luis Amaral Afonso [The moderator
According to Afonso's definition of the W statistic, W must be between zero and one. Thus, both ends of his confidence interval are less than or equal to |p1^ - p2^|.
This means that D is always <= |p1^ - p2^|. In the particular case where we observe p1^ = p2^, it follows that D <= 0. Since D by definition can't be negative, D = 0. It follows that the hypothesis H: p1 = p2 is true and must be accepted.
Thus, based on Afonso's complete and unbiased formulas, he has proved that whenever we observe p1^ = p2^, the null hypothesis H: p1 = p2 must be true.
Good work!
Jack (moderator)
.
- References:
- A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- From: Luis A. Afonso
- A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- Prev by Date: Extracting individual treatment means from a factorial model response variable.
- Next by Date: Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- Previous by thread: Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- Next by thread: Re: A * Titans * fight II: Jack Tomsky versus R. A. Fisher
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|