Re: TO COMPLETE

WORMTOMSKY said:

*** Afonso has expressed hypotheses in terms of test
statistics instead of parameters, has called
Quantiles of test statistics "confidence intervals"
and has called p-values "significance levels. He
denies that the sample lies in the sample space. He
needs to take a course in Statistics 101. Jack
(moderator) ***

My response
__A liar and a BRUNDLE

__1__THE LIAR____I do not never made confusion
between a statistic (a function of data) and a
parameter (a constant characterizing the
Distribution),
__2__THE BRUNDLE___Once the Statistics simulated by
Monte Carlo its fractiles provided the Critical
Values: Herbert Lilliefors open a DOOR to a guard
that obtuse Mathematicians with their own tools were
unable to find solution, analytically.. THEY PREFER
TO HAVE EXACT SOLUTIONS TO MORE OR LESS CLOSE
PROBLEMS THAN TO HAVE GOOD APPROXIMATIONS TO THE
E REAL ONES UNDER STUDY.
Furthermore the degree of approximation is rigorously
controlled by a 70 years result: the Dvoretzky-
Kiefer-Wolfowitz that Jack Tomsky did not met before
I presented it HERE. I clearly jumped thought TWO
YEARS AGO (or so). Effectively I said that Herbert
Lilliefors found Confidence Intervals, a correction
if made once, was to be accepted and acknowledged, as
I did, if repeated daily only shows what Jack Tomsky
is: unfair, ethically deficient, and trying, using no
matter means, erase his BRUNDLES (much more serious,
indeed, than my improper attribution). STINGY people
do not lose n opportunity to show is stinginess. In
his stupidity he is unable, even at present, to
understand what marvelous tool Lilliefors brought to
PRACTICAL STATISTICS. He shall never do.
__3__He denies that the sample lies in the sample
space: THIS IS A LIE, Readers, THE BRUNDLE was from
Jack Tomsky that *** the samples are in the
parameter’s SPACE *** to what I reply in these terms:
NOT AT ALL the samples are too rough to enter in a
space that is an INTERVAL. This boy is STUPID,
STINGY; MACHIEVOUS and LIAR
************************
I had forgotten a very important Jack Tomsky
inaccuracy
____Test Hypotheses ARE NOT EXCLUSIVELY CONCERNING
PARAMETERS.
___ TO KIND OF THEM DO NOT HAVING TO DO WITH THEM:
____The GOODNESS OF RITTING (GOF),
____ AND the NO-PARAMETRIC
it´s logic to think that Jack Tomsky never find them
(exactly alike in what concerns TESTS BY
SIMULATION).


Luis Amaral Afonso [The moderator (???) destroyer]



Afonso again repeats his ignorance that the sample space has to be an interval. The sample space is the set of all possible sample outcomes. By definition, each sample has to lie in the sample space.

Afonso again refuses to believe that hypotheses are statements about subsets of the parameter space. That's why he came up with the notorious H: 5/13 <= 8/13, which he is unable to accept.

Jack (moderator)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Simple C Statistics
    ... > links to public domain Fortran and C code for statistics. ... Basically I figure there is a sample, the sample space, the population, ... on essentially neural networks, as neural networks are modelled in some ... my next question is "what C libraries are available for portable ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Confidence Intervals for Bridge Simulations (long)
    ... range are impossible -- that's cookbook statistics. ... Grant me some sort of prior probability distribution assumption as to ... that's consistent with a population frequency as low as ... kind of prior distribution information to make confidence intervals ...
    (rec.games.bridge)
  • Re: Simple binomial test question
    ... I have only a handful fo statistics books in my office. ... "Let the decisions of accepting or rejecting H be denoted by do ... let Wn be a set in the sample space Rn which ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Determining Confidence Interval
    ... > occurrences), how large a sample of total occurrences will be required ... > confidence that this result reflects a consistent trend or would I ... Confidence intervals are appropriate when you have ... are way off the mark for what statistics can tell you. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: resampling methods are serious procedure?
    ... mentioned it right before you described sampling. ... However, you are teaching an approach to statistics, however ... I apologize for my hostile tone. ... I'm still not lined up with you re: confidence intervals. ...
    (sci.stat.math)