Re: MANCOVA: describing effect directions
- From: Ray Koopman <koopman@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 4, 12:51 pm, Niklaus Kuehnis <kuehnik_0...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I computed MANCOVAS (SPSS GLM) with 8 simultaneous dependent metric
variables, one binary categorical IV and several metric covariates.
There was a main effect for the categorical IV, for several metric
covariates as well as some IV*covariate interactions.
My questions are:
a) Is it possible to know the *direction* of these effects by
looking at some output parameters? E.g., am I allowed to interpret
the direction of beta weights?
The rules for interpreting the betas are the same as in ordinary
regression: if your data are naturalistic observations then you need
to choose your words very carefully, to avoid even hinting at
causation.
Question (a) refers to the overall effects of the IVs/covariates as
well as to the univariate tests for every DV.
b) How to plot an effect of a metric covariate on a single metric DV?
Does it make sense to run a bivariate linear regression and make a
scatterplot with the regression line?
You need two lines, one for each group. If the covariate does not
interact with group then the lines will be parallel; if it does
interact then the lines will not be parallel.
c) How to plot an interaction between a binary IV and a covariate?
Run two bivariate regressions for each group and plot two linear
regressions?
Yes.
Generally speaking: Do linear plots make sense to describe MANCOVA
results?
Yes.
.
(xpost & followup 2 ssm)
I appreciate any comments.
--
Niklaus
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MANCOVA: describing effect directions
- From: Niklaus Kuehnis
- Re: MANCOVA: describing effect directions
- Prev by Date: Re: Experimental design doubt
- Next by Date: Re: MANCOVA: describing effect directions
- Previous by thread: Re: Improving Lilliefors Test
- Next by thread: Re: MANCOVA: describing effect directions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|