Re: Improving Lilliefors Test
- From: "Luis A. Afonso" <licas_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:39:13 EDT
In reference to my Sep 7, 2008 3:13 PM post, column k=1, I have to join that after to change n=19 --- > .197 the later adjustment gave
___________y = a * b^n * n^c
(y=critical value, alpha=0.05):
___________a = 0.68517 539
___________b = 0.99725 938
___________c = -.40588 224
The degree of adjust is such that
__________ sigma 0.00025, r = 0.99997 509
I do remember that each critical value was obtained based on 400 000 sized n normal samples.
Luis A. Afonso
.
- Prev by Date: Re: How many data points for statistical significant results?
- Next by Date: Re: How many data points for statistical significant results?
- Previous by thread: Re: Improving Lilliefors Test
- Next by thread: Re: MANCOVA: describing effect directions
- Index(es):
