Re: microtome deconvolution
From: Carlshead (carlshead_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/03/04
- Next message: Gordon Couger: "Re: reichert and yung question"
- Previous message: sdh_h: "microtome deconvolution"
- In reply to: sdh_h: "microtome deconvolution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 01:04:31 GMT
"sdh_h" <sdh_h@gazeta.pl> wrote in message
news:cc4dfm$nbv$1@inews.gazeta.pl...
> Hello, does anybody know something about deconvolution of microtome
> samples, what schould be thickness of slice? It is better to deconvolute
> multi-layer confocal image or typical fluoroscence image? Anu
> publications, URL's?
>
> TIA
> SDH
Hello,
I am guessing you are looking for a system that will image slices through
the sample. If so:
http://www.meyerinst.com/html/resolve3d/default.htm
We used to represent this system, and it has never been removed from our
website. The system was fabulous but very expensive. You sent your sample
to their lab, they sent you data, you bought a workstation to work with your
data. The company is out of business. We don't know what the status of the
technology may be at this time. The key was specialized "black" embedding
media of a very proprietary nature.
I found this with a quick Google search:
http://www.scanning.org/scanabstracts/SCANNING02/24107.casestudy.html
Best of luck,
Carl
- Next message: Gordon Couger: "Re: reichert and yung question"
- Previous message: sdh_h: "microtome deconvolution"
- In reply to: sdh_h: "microtome deconvolution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|