Re: Image Analysis

From: GTO (gregor_o_at_NOSPAMyahoo.com)
Date: 10/09/04 

Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 05:32:59 GMT

In which regard is Able Image more stable than ImageJ? Which version of JRE
and ImageJ are you familiar with?

Gregor

"Matt Denver" <nospam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:cjtqe2$f4m$1@planja.arnes.si...
>
> If you are running Windows you might want to take a look at Able Image
> Analyser (able.mulabs.com). It is more stable than ImageJ and has steeper
> learning curve. It costs $100 though.
>
> Regards,
> MPD
>
>
>
> "Manuel" <maa27@nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:Pine.LNX.4.60.0410041026170.32087@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk...
>> Hello,
>>
>> I hope this is the right group to post - if not, perhaps someone can
>> point
>> me in the right direction.
>>
>> We are looking for a good setup for image analyses for our microscopy
>> laboratory (we study soil thin section). We have four microscopes, some
>> with digital video cameras already (interfacing, one, througha frame
>> grabber, the other through a vie card), but are looking into purchasing
>> at
>> least an extra digital still camera and, if necessary, software for image
>> analysis, database storage.
>>
>> What are current views about this? Are there any free downloadable
>> software that deserve to be considered in lieu of commercial ones? What
>> cameras are best for the x10 to x400 range (with PPL and XPL)?
>>
>> Many thanks?
>>
>> m.
>
>